Friday, 30 September 2022

Nvidia explains what you need to know about RTX 4000 GPU power demands

https://ift.tt/ZGnH3SI

Nvidia has clarified the situation around its RTX 4000 graphics cards and their demands on the power supply front, after what Team Green described as an “uptick in questions” regarding compatibility with the incoming next-gen GPUs.

And the short answer for those worrying that they might need to buy a new power supply for compatibility in an outright sense is that they needn’t worry – it’s not necessary to have a new ATX 3.0 model with PCIe 5.0 power connectors (known as 12VHPWR).

Current (no pun intended) ATX 2.0 PSUs will still work fine with any Nvidia RTX 4000 model, although that said, the power supply obviously needs to be powerful enough to handle the GPU, just the same as with any graphics card.

All this info is delivered in the form of a new FAQ, as Tom’s Hardware spotted, where Nvidia reminds us that a power adapter is supplied with next-gen Lovelace GPUs to allow ATX 2.0 power supplies to be hooked up.

So, concerning the mentioned wattage recommendations for PSUs – ATX 2.0 and 3.0 alike – what are they exactly? Well, Nvidia has stipulated that would-be RTX 4090 owners should have a power supply of at least 850W. For the RTX 4080 16GB the requirement is 750W, and it’s slightly less for the RTX 4080 12GB variant at 700W.


As Nvidia points out, these next-gen GPU power demands are not that much different to the asks made by current-gen RTX 3000 models, namely 750W for the RTX 3090 and 3080 – though obviously the RTX 4090 flagship needs a bit more juice. However, it delivers what’s promising to be a pretty big leap in performance relative to the extra power consumption.

As you may realize, these PSU requirements aren’t quite as simple as they seem on the face of it. Where it gets complicated is that you may need more wattage depending on the rest of your PC components, and principally the CPU, if you have a really beefy processor that has major power requirements of its own. (Intel’s fastest Alder Lake chip, the 12900KS, can pull around 240W at max boost for example, which may not quite be up there with a top-end Nvidia GPU, but it’s still a lot).

On the whole, this is definitely an area where you want to err on the side of caution, and speaking of that, it’s worth noting that even PSUs which carry the same wattage rating can be of different quality. And needless to say, you don’t want to run some cheapo no-name brand PSU with a high-end Nvidia card, not that any PC enthusiast would dream of doing so. But it’s worth making the broader point that you should always stick with trusted PSU brands that’ll deliver more on the reliability and stability fronts (such as the models recommended in our roundup of the best PSUs). Even if you’re paying a bit more, we’ve long argued that the power supply is an often-overlooked component that plays a key role in the PC’s operation.

Also, we’d advise going a bit higher than the recommend wattage level anyway, if possible – it just seems sensible to have a bit of extra headroom, especially when it comes to heavyweight GPUs. Our rule of thumb is to chuck an extra 100W on top of what you think you’ll need, in a better safe than sorry kind of fashion.

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that Nvidia offers further clarification on the issue of a recently leaked email from PCI-SIG (the organization that oversees the PCI Express spec, and more) which caused folks to worry that there might be a potential risk with ATX 2.0 PSUs using 12VHPWR connectors.

This stemmed from concerns aired by PCI-SIG in the past, back in the prototyping stage, but the issue has since been resolved. Team Green noted: “Nvidia has confirmed that it was an isolated problem with a prototype connector from a specific vendor, and the supplier has since solved the issue.”



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/4jSVZ2p
via IFTTT

Thursday, 29 September 2022

64-core Ryzen 7000 Threadripper monster caught in the wild

https://ift.tt/ZGnH3SI

It’s been only a few days since AMD rolled out its Ryzen 7000 processors with up to 16 Zen 4 cores and there are already rumblings of its next big CPU announcement.

What appears to be the follow-up to the world’s fastest x86 processor - the Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX -  has appeared in a popular scientific computing project, einstein@home, as reported by prolific CPU chaser Benchleaks (via Tom'sHardware).

The processor is listed as an “AuthenticAMD AMD Eng Sample: 100-000000454-20_Y [Family 25 Model 24 Stepping 1]” which, with 128 threads (64 cores, two threads each) and an unusual identifier, doesn’t correspond to any current AMD processor.

Following in the footsteps of its predecessor, this impending Storm Peak product is likely to be called named 7995WX and have four dies stuck together (probably underclocked 65W AMD Ryzen 9 7950X), reaching a TDP of around 260W with some overheads (I/O etc.), which will nicely match the 280W TDP of the Zen 3-powered 5995WX. The latter had a base clock of 2.7GHz with a maximum boost clock up to 4.5GHz, 292MB combined cache (L1 + L2 + L3).

Workstation galore

The new processors will find their way into desktop workstation PCs, where high processor/thread counts help tremendously - more than just higher frequencies - with a wide variety of tasks: video editing, rendering, financial analysis, GIS, AI, ML etc.

Lenovo, Dell and boutique providers (Maingear, Velocity Micro, Puget Systems) are likely to launch products based around the latest Threadripper, probably in June 2023.

Intel will also be watching closely as it seeks to ramp up the number of cores, mirroring what we have seen in the consumer market. For the first time, Core i7 processors (the 13th generation launched just a few days ago) now have 16 cores, matching AMD’s Ryzen 7 family.

Will Intel up the ante and boost its Xeon core count (currently peaking at 40 cores)? We wouldn't bet against it, although that may require a big price drop to maintain some sense of competitiveness; the 40-core 8380 costs around 50% more than the 64-core 5995WX.

It will also be interesting to see whether AMD launches a new range of Threadripper processors aimed at mobile workstations, a small but still very lucrative niche currently dominated by Intel.  



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/IbyX7pf
via IFTTT

Wednesday, 28 September 2022

Intel Demos Sapphire Rapids Hardware Accelerator Blocks In Action At Innovation 2022

https://ift.tt/45kgcHx

With Intel’s annual Innovation event taking place this week in San Jose, the company is looking to recapture a lot of technical momentum that has slowly been lost over the past couple of years. While Intel has remained hard at work releasing new products over the time, the combination of schedule slips and an inability to show off their wares to in-person audiences has taken some of the luster off the company and its products. So for their biggest in-person technical event since prior to the pandemic, the company is showing off as much silicon as they can, to convince press, partners, and customers alike that CEO Pat Gelsinger’s efforts have put the company back on track.

Of all of Intel’s struggles over the past couple of years, there is no better poster child than their Sapphire Rapids server/workstation CPU. A true next-generation product from Intel that brings everything from PCIe 5 and DDR5 to CXL and a slew of hardware accelerators, there’s really nothing to write about Sapphire Rapids’ delays that hasn’t already been said – it’s going to end up over a year late.

But Sapphire Rapids is coming. And Intel is finally able to see the light at the end of the tunnel on those development efforts. With general availability slated for Q1 of 2023, just over a quarter from now, Intel is finally in a position to show off Sapphire Rapids to a wider audience – or at least, members of the press. Or to take a more pragmatic read on matters, Intel now needs to start seriously promoting Sapphire Rapids ahead of its launch, and that of its competition.

For this year’s show, Intel invited members of the press to see a live demo of pre-production Sapphire Rapids silicon in action. The purpose of the demos, besides to give the press the ability to say “we saw it; it exists!” is to start showing off one of the more unique features of Sapphire Rapids: its collection of dedicated accelerator blocks.

Along with delivering a much-needed update to the CPU’s processor cores, Sapphire Rapids is also adding/integration dedicated accelerator blocks for several common CPU-critical server/workstation workloads. The idea, simply put, is that fixed function silicon can do the task as quickly or better than CPU cores for a fraction of the power, and for only a fractional increase in die size. And with hyperscalers and other server operators looking for big improvements in compute density and energy efficiency, domain specific accelerators such as these are a good way for Intel to deliver that kind of edge to their customers. And it doesn’t hurt either that rival AMD isn’t expected to have similar accelerator blocks.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/CTanMeP
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 27 September 2022

NZXT Unveils N7 Z790 Motherboard for Intel 13th Gen Core Series

https://ift.tt/14x3ijf

With a lot of news and info dropping on Intel's latest Z790 chipset using the LGA1700 socket, NZXT has pulled the trigger and announced its N7 Z790 motherboard. Available in either white or black, it features a 2.5 GbE controller, Wi-Fi 6E CNVi, benefits from support for PCIe 5.0, and includes three M.2 slots.

In addition to the announcement of Intel's 13th Gen Core series processors, codenamed Raptor Lake, NZXT has announced its plans to launch the N7 for Z790. As we've seen from NZXT motherboards in the past, the N7 Z790 has a large swathe of armor covering the board and is available in both back and white color schemes. It should be noted that neither the black nor white model includes any integrated RGB LED lighting. Typical with an NZXT product, the N7 Z790 comes with support with their CAM software.

Some of the NZXT N7 Z790's main features include one full-length PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, two full-length PCIe 4.0 slots operating at x4/x4, and two PCIe 3.0 x1 slots. Also present on the NZXT N7 Z790 are three M.2 slots, two with support for PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe drives and one with support for both PCIe 4.0 x4 and SATA. NZXT also includes four SATA ports with support for RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10 arrays for more conventional storage. NZXT is also advertising support for DDR5-6000 memory, with a combined total of 128 GB supported across four slots.

NZXT is also advertising a 16+1+2-phase power delivery, with one 8-pin EPS 12 V and one 4-pin 12 V power connector pairing to deliver power to the CPU. Powering the rest of the board's components is a 24-pin 12V power connector.

The rear I/O is modest yet practical, with two USB 3.2 G2 Type-A and three USB 3.2 G1 Type-A; interestingly, NZXT doesn't include any rear panel Type-C connectivity. Also on the rear panel are five 3.5 mm audio jacks and one S/PDIF optical output powered by a Realtek ALC1220 HD audio codec, with two antenna ports for an unspecified Wi-Fi 6E CNVi. Finishing off the rear panel is a single HDMI TM video output, with one Realtek RTL8125BG 2.5 GbE controller.

The NZXT N7 Z790 is scheduled to release with an MSRP of $300 and will be available in Q4 2022 in the USA. NZXT hasn't shared whether or not this will be released in other regions.

Source: NZXT



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/TeqBDwL
via IFTTT

Intel 13th gen CPUs launch with big boosts – should AMD be worried?

https://ift.tt/Aev3mIQ

After months of leaks and speculation, Intel has officially announced its 13th generation Intel Core desktop processors, and given us (and its rival AMD) a glimpse of what to expect.

Formerly known as ‘Raptor Lake’, Intel’s 13th generation of processors will once again make use of Intel’s hybrid design, with a mix of Performance-cores and Efficient-cores, which cleverly kick in, depending on what sort of task you’re using the CPU for, with Intel Turbo Boost Max 3.0 helping to identify the best performing Performance-cores (P-Cores).

Intel’s previous 12th generation of 'Alder Lake' CPUs also used this design, but the company claims this new generation will benefit from more Efficient-cores (E-Cores), that allow for more Intel Smart Cache (L3) for improved performance, especially with large data sets, and L2 cache has been increased to speed up data transfers between cache and memory. This, again, could lead to improved performance.

The specs

Intel 13th gen Core CPUs will support up to 16 PCIe 5.0 lanes, and will support DDR5 memory up to 5600 MT/s. Unlike rival AMD, which is only supporting the new RAM standard on its new Ryzen 7000 chips, Intel 13th gen processors will continue to support DDR4 RAM.

Integrated Intel UHD Xe graphics will support up to 8K at 60Hz, or up to four 4K screens at 60Hz, and there will also be integrated Wi-Fi support for Wi-Fi 6 and the newer Wi-Fi 6E standards.

The flagship Intel Core i9 chips will come with 24 processor cores made up of eight P-cores and 16 E-cores, with the i7 chips will come with 16 cores (eight P-cores and eight E-cores), and the i5 chips will come with 14 cores (six P-cores and eight E-cores).

See the below table for the full specs:

Intel Core i9K and i9KF Intel Core i7K and i7KF Intel Core i5K and i5KF
Max Turbo Frequency [GHz] Up to 5.8 Up to 5.4 Up to 5.1
Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency [GHz] Up to 5.7 Up to 5.4 n/a
Performance-core Max Turbo Frequency [GHz] Up to 5.4 Up to 5.3 Up to 5.1
Efficient-core Max Turbo Frequency [GHz] Up to 4.3 Up to 4.2 Up to 3.9
Performance-core Base Frequency [GHz] 3.0 3.4 3.5
Efficient-core Base Frequency [GHz] 2.2 2.5 2.6
Processor Cores (P-cores + E-cores) 24 (8P+16E) 16 (8P+8E) 14 (6P+8E)
Total Processor Threads 32 24 20
Intel Smart Cache (L3) Size [MB] 36 MB 30 MB 24 MB
Total L2 Cache Size [MB] 32 MB 24 MB 20 MB
Enhanced Intel UHD Graphics driven by Xe Architecture i9K: Intel UHD Graphics 770 i9KF: no i7K: Intel UHD Graphics 770 i7KF: no i5K: Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5KF: no

Analysis: The pressure is on Intel

Intel 13th Gen Core processor on white background

(Image credit: Intel)

The 13th gen Core launch comes at a crucial time for Intel. While it is still undoubtedly the market leader in the CPU space, that lead has been eroded over the years by a resurgent AMD, which has released a series of critically-acclaimed processors.

In fact, just the day before Intel’s 13th gen announcement, the reviews dropped for AMD’s 7000 series of CPUs – and AMD has continued its winning streak, with both the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X chips getting rare five star reviews from us, the latter of which we now feel is the best processor you can buy right now.

So, Intel really needs to impress us with its 13th generation. There’re some interesting differences between the two. For a start, Intel is continuing with its hybrid design, whereas AMD’s sticking to a more traditional approach, which it claims gives it the performance edge.

However, in an interesting turn of events, by supporting cheaper DDR4 RAM, and allowing 13th generation processors to be installed in both new 700 series motherboards and the older 600 motherboards, which makes upgrading to the new CPUs easier and cheaper.

Meanwhile, if you want to use a new AMD CPU, you’ll need to buy new DDR5 RAM and a new motherboard, which can seriously bump up the potential price of this upgrade.

It will all boil down to price and performance. AMD has hit the ground running with a new generation of processors that perform brilliantly, and cost less than their predecessors. We haven’t got prices from Intel, nor will we know just how well these chips perform until we get them in for our full reviews, but the 13th gen Core CPUs will need to pull out all the stops – while remaining affordable – if it wants to put a stop to AMD’s momentum.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/fynuR9U
via IFTTT

Why Intel Raptor Lake’s disappointing laptop CPU benchmarks don’t add up

https://ift.tt/Cw7tOvG

Intel’s Raptor Lake processors for laptops have been spotted in some leaked benchmarks, giving us a potential idea of their performance – and at first glance, it seems seriously disappointing, but there’s more to this than meets the eye, as we’ll discuss shortly.

First off, let’s examine the benchmarks themselves, which are from mobile CPUs running in a Samsung laptop. Namely the beefy Core i9-13900HK and the Core i7-13700H, both of which appeared in Geekbench 5, as Benchleaks highlighted in a couple of tweets (via Wccftech). Treat all of this with a good deal of caution, as with any spilled benchmarks.

See more

The pre-release sample 13900HK, which has 14-cores and 20-threads (meaning 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores), recorded a result of 1,817 for single-thread and 11,799 for multi-thread.

The Core i9-13900HK hit almost 5.4GHz for maximum boost during benchmarking, averaging just a touch under 5.3GHz.

As for the Core i7-13700H, this laptop CPU has the same core configuration as the Core i9 above, and achieved a score of 1,768 for single-threaded performance, and 10796 for multi-threaded.

This 13700H managed a top boost speed of very nearly 5GHz during benchmarking, and averaged at 4.9GHz.


Analysis: Big boost, but wonky performance? And the mystery of the ‘T’

Seeing a 5.4GHz boost – still at a relatively early stage – for the Core i9-13900HK is pretty impressive, as if you recall, the 12900HK boosts to 5GHz, so it’s a chunky step up. That said, the Geekbench results are disappointing on the face of it, as these laptop processors are slower than their Alder Lake counterparts. However, this is still an early sample CPU, and clearly there’s still work to be done – we can expect much speedier results as Raptor Lake mobile comes closer to release.

Furthermore, there is a notable oddity here, as the more eagle-eyed will have noticed, which is that the Intel processors in these leaked benchmarks are labeled as ‘CoreT’ rather than just Core. So, is this a new brand of mobile chip? After all, Intel did just announce the future rebranding of its Celeron and Pentium parts for laptops, as you may recall, with those names being retired – so this has led some to speculate about what’s going on here.

Well, we very much doubt any change is happening here. CoreT is a clunky looking name, and besides, Intel did clarify in the whole Celeron renaming thing that the Core family (and vPro) would remain exactly as they are with no alteration. Also, Intel already has a T-series which are lower-power chips (clocked slower), so this would be seemingly confusing all-round (the ‘T’ in those CPUs comes at the end of the processor name, not after Core, too).

As Wccftech points out, what’s most likely going on here is that this was supposed to say ‘TM’ – as in trademark – on Geekbench, and the ‘M’ has been missed off. Or it’s some kind of mistake, at any rate, or indeed this could point to the benchmarks being fake (always a possibility).

That aside, there’s a bit of further confusion here: the cache sizes stipulated are the same as Alder Lake, rather than Raptor Lake which beefs up things a bit on this front. This could point to Raptor Lake mobile being a straight and simple refresh of Alder Lake, which again would be disappointing – but we think it’s too early to be drawing conclusions like this.

Or, as Wccftech theorizes, there could be CoreT parts as a simple refresh, and actual Raptor Lake mobile CPUs aside from this (with the larger cache sizes). But we’re not buying this for all the reasons we’ve just gone over, and it’d just complicate things massively for consumers, of course.

We should see more leakage in the near future on the laptop processor front for Raptor Lake, and that’ll no doubt help clarify some of the sketchier points these benchmarks have raised. We’re pretty sure, however, that CoreT is a red herring, and we’re definitely sure that these mobile CPUs will be much faster than this when release comes. They have to be, quite simply.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/zP5Tydf
via IFTTT

Monday, 26 September 2022

AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X Review: Retaking The High-End

https://ift.tt/tm4NVH9

Back at CES 2022, which was held in Las Vegas earlier at the beginning of the year, AMD announced that its new Zen 4 core would be coming sometime in the second half of 22. During AMD’s ‘together we advance_PCs’ live streamed event at the end of August, AMD unveiled its Ryzen 7000 series of desktop processors, with four SKUs aimed at different product segments. Today AMD has officially launched Ryzen 7000 with the Ryzen 9 7950X sitting as the brand’s representative of performance leadership in an x86 processor for desktops.

On paper, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16C/32T behemoth to take overall performance leadership in desktop computing. Their entry point into the market is the Ryzen 5 7600X, which has 6C/12T and harnesses all the benefits of the flagship in a more svelte and affordable chiplet-based package. AMD pins its hopes on bringing that all-important performance crown back to its side with Zen 4 with its new architecture based on TSMC’s 5 nm process; prepare for battle. We’ve detailed what Zen 4 brings to the table regarding the new microarchitecture and tests the new Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X through our CPU suite.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/kVmZhl1
via IFTTT

Radeon RX 6000 GPUs can get a huge boost with this new software - but there’s a catch

https://ift.tt/DWYw16y

If you’ve got one of AMD’s Radeon RX 6000 series graphics cards and are looking rather longingly at the RTX 4090, we might have good news for you. New third-party utility software is claiming to provide huge performance boosts for RDNA 2 GPUs, enough to potentially outstrip Nvidia’s current-gen flagship RTX 3090 Ti, and all without the crazy price tags now attached to Team Green’s cards.

‘Radeon Monster Profile’ (RMP) comes from coder and overclocking enthusiast Yuri Bubliy, who claims to have created a utility software that delicately modifies the voltage and frequency curves of RDNA 2 cards to improve performance.

Bubliy is well-known in the hardware enthusiast space, having already created AMD-focused software for monitoring and overclocking components (most notably his HYDRA software for Ryzen CPUs, of which RMP is a utility extension). RMP is his latest piece of work, and will be available later in 2022.

In a post on Twitter breaking down some of the details, Bubliy explains that RMP enables the RX 6000 cards to reach their ‘maximum potential', with special attention paid to areas such as the VRAM subsystem, where a reduction in operating voltage allowed for reduced heat generation to keep the card as a whole running within safe a temperature range.

See more

Analysis: This is impressive, but let’s not get too excited just yet

Bubily claims that the Radeon Monster Profile can boost the performance of the RX 6800 XT by more than 13% without thermal throttling issues, which makes that card slightly outperform a stock-settings RTX 3090 Ti - with significantly less power draw, too. It’s a serious performance leap, but as always we’d be wary of using third-party software to tweak your GPU.

It’s also important to note that the performance figures listed are from the 3DMark Time Spy GPU test - a synthetic benchmark often used to gauge graphical performance. We don’t know what other components Bubliy used for testing, nor do we know how well this overclocked RX 6800 XT performs in real-world gaming and rendering benchmarks.

Using third-party software to tweak your GPU - especially in such an aggressive manner as this - can also potentially void your warranty, so tread carefully if you choose to test out RMP when it releases. AMD does have its own software, Radeon Adrenalin, for tweaking your GPU, which may be a safer bet.  You can also check out our guide to overclocking your GPU.

Still, we’re quite intrigued by RMP, since it does represent a way for RDNA 2 GPU owners to close the performance gap somewhat once RDNA 3 arrives later this year. Sure, the RX 6800 XT isn’t one of the best graphics cards out there, but if RMP can safely improve its performance, then it’ll become a far more reasonable choice of GPU.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/oasv26k
via IFTTT

Friday, 23 September 2022

Intel Raptor Lake flagship benchmark leak shows a seriously fast CPU

https://ift.tt/AMDBcSU

Intel’s next-gen flagship CPU has been spotted in a leaked benchmark, with the Raptor Lake chip showing a good turn of speed.

The Core i9-13900K has turned up in PassMark, as Tum_Apisak brought to our attention on Twitter (courtesy of VideoCardz), with the processor being ranked on four sample runs.

See more

The 13900K scored 4,833 (averaged) in single-thread performance, which is around 15% faster than its predecessor (and almost 10% quicker than the special edition 12900KS). A pretty impressive performance that gets it top spot in the PassMark rankings here.

For multi-threaded the 13900K hit 54,433 points which is 31% faster than the 12900K, and indeed almost 20% quicker than the Ryzen 9 5950X in PassMark’s CPU Mark. Again, that’s a good early showing, and has certainly spiked some expectations around what the Raptor Lake flagship might deliver – though we should always be very cautious around leaked benchmarks.


Analysis: Promising stuff – and a sign that Raptor Lake is coming soon?

Obviously, this is just one benchmark suite – and four sample runs as noted – so there’s very much a limit to what we might infer here. PassMark isn’t the benchmark we’re most excited to see in leaks either, but nonetheless, it represents a piece of the puzzle regarding the overall performance of the 13900K. But it’s just that – one piece, and not a central element of the jigsaw either, many would argue.

At the same time, there’s no denying that the kind of uplift demonstrated here is eye-opening. Sadly, what we don’t have yet is any next-gen Ryzen 7000 processors showing up on PassMark, which would obviously make for the most illuminating comparison. And that’s a little strange, as AMD’s Zen 4 chips are out imminently – on September 27, in fact – and Raptor Lake silicon isn’t even revealed yet. (That reveal is thought to be happening on the same day as Ryzen 7000 goes on sale, which appears to be some tricksy maneuvering by AMD in terms of removing wind from Intel’s sails).

Raptor Lake chips won’t go on sale until next month – seemingly mid-October, or thereabouts – but maybe these benchmarks turning up now is a glimmer of hope that they might debut sooner in October rather than later. We shall see, but at least it points to Intel’s 13th-gen CPUs not being delayed from their rumored launch schedule, anyway.

We already know the 13900K can boost to 5.8GHz (albeit briefly) at stock, and a future chip – the 13900KS presumably, which again is likely to turn up as a special, higher-binned edition of the flagship – is set to boost to 6GHz, Intel recently let us know. And again, that’s at stock performance, as in default, right out of the box.

Raptor Lake is certainly shaping up impressively, then, but so is AMD’s Zen 4, with the next-gen flagship Ryzen 7950X already breaking world records in some benchmarks where the top performers used the likes of liquid nitrogen – and yet the 7950X ran with standard you-can-do-this-at-home cooling.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/L3MokzX
via IFTTT

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU monster 7.2GHz overclock spotted – but is it enough to threaten Intel?

https://ift.tt/AMDBcSU

AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X processor has been overclocked to more than 7.2GHz with exotic cooling, a fresh leak has revealed.

As Wccftech reports, Tum_Apisak highlighted this one on Twitter, complete with CPU-Z screenshots showing the 16-core Zen 4 flagship reaching 6.5GHz across all its cores, and 7.247GHz on one core. This was using liquid nitrogen cooling.

See more

The single-core high was achieved with a voltage of 1.506V, and we can see that overclocking to 6.5GHz across all cores required 1.465V.

As with any leak, we should of course apply our own seasoning, but with the CPU clearly out there and being tested by lots of folks (like reviewers, and overclocking experts) ahead of its imminent release – on September 27 – it’s not surprising to see plenty of spillage occurring around Zen 4 processors.


Analysis: Clash of the next-gen Titans

Clearly, these are very promising initial speeds for the Ryzen 9 7950X to reach – and we will doubtless see the flagship CPU go a lot faster after it’s released, and overclockers have time to really get to grips with the processor. (Remember, initial overclocking records are always bettered down the line by experts – and we’re not even at the point of official release for the 7950X yet).

Some folks, however, may think back to recent Raptor Lake leaks – Intel’s next-gen CPUs which will rival Ryzen 7000 – and recall that the 13th-gen flagship (13900K) has already popped up showing it’s capable of being overclocked to a staggering 8GHz (not an area Intel has been anywhere near for a long time with overclocking potential).

That said, it obviously doesn’t pay to be overly obsessed and focused on raw clock speeds, because there’s a lot more to processor performance than this – most notably the IPC (instructions per clock) improvements that a new generation brings in. And don’t forget, Zen 4 is an all-new architecture promising a big step forward for AMD.

Indeed, a very recent leak shows AMD’s Ryzen 7950X already breaking benchmarking world records with standard cooling – beating existing records that use exotic cooling, no less. So what this flagship will be able to do on liquid nitrogen should be seriously impressive on the performance front. But with Raptor Lake hitting truly eye-opening overclocks by all accounts, the clash at the top-end for next-gen CPUs promises to be enthralling for enthusiasts looking at juicing up these flagships.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/YWjc870
via IFTTT

Thursday, 22 September 2022

AMD Ryzen 7950X CPU is already breaking records, and without exotic cooling

https://ift.tt/4OpGSyi

AMD’s incoming Zen 4 flagship has already broken CPU world records using standard liquid cooling, outperforming previous records that have used exotic cooling (like liquid nitrogen or similar).

The Ryzen 7950X set the records for the rankings on HWBOT, with two overclocking experts – Sampson and Blueleader – achieving four new all-time highs using just a Corsair H115i all-in-one liquid cooler (with the 7950X running in a number of different X670E high-end motherboards).

The specific world records set were in Cinebench R15, R20, R23 and 7-Zip, as Hot Hardware reports (via VideoCardz), with the likes of Splave losing the top spot in these rankings as a result.

What’s also notable is that the 7950X, which is a 16-core processor, hit 5.4GHz to 5.5GHz boost speeds across all cores in this testing, with temperatures ranging from 87C to 108C – and power usage running up to 244W at maximum.


Analysis: The best is yet to come

For a chip using a (relatively) simple liquid cooler to beat the likes of Splave’s previous records in these rankings is seriously impressive. As mentioned, Splave (and others populating the very top of these benchmark charts) used the likes of liquid nitrogen for cooling. Obviously that’s not something that is feasible for an everyday PC, or the average enthusiast, but a Corsair H115i certainly is within reach of those folks.

Naturally, this makes us wonder exactly what the Ryzen 7950X will be able to achieve when it does get some exotic cooling and the overclocking ante truly ramps up. It's likely already going to nab a slot among our ranking of the best processors, after all.

Some skeptics are asking questions, such as what the ambient temperature in the room for these records was, but there’s no denying this is an eye-opening feat – and one that hopefully points the way to some seriously power-efficient processors further down the Ryzen 7000 range, where most people will be buying.

We do, of course, already know that AMD has made some big promises on the efficiency front with RDNA 3 graphics cards, and with vastly inflated energy costs hitting the pockets of a lot of people these days, that’s got to be a big plus point.

With RDNA 3, then, we could be looking at some attractive CPUs for both average users and overclocking fiends alike. Indeed, in recent times we’ve also been hearing a lot about how Intel’s next-gen Raptor Lake is set to be a really good performer for overclocking – already reaching 8GHz with the flagship – so it seems that the entire sphere of next-gen processors could be a tempting place for enthusiasts. Raptor Lake, however, when really pushed, won’t hold that same efficiency level…



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/XVp3wsg
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 20 September 2022

AMD Launches Mendocino APUs: Zen 2-based Ryzen and Athlon 7020 Series with RDNA 2 Graphics

https://ift.tt/RH2c3U5

Even though the main focus this month has been on AMD's upcoming launch of its Ryzen 7000 desktop series processors based on the Zen 4 architecture, AMD is also in the process of launching its 7020 series of processors designed for entry-level mobile, codenamed Mendocino. It has launched four new SKUs for mobile, including two Ryzen series models and two Athlon variants, all based on its Zen 2 architecture.

As we learned in May, AMD's Zen 2 based 'Mendocino' APUs are designed as part of its lower-end mobile processor stack for entry-level thin notebook and laptop solutions. The affordable APUs incorporate up to 4 Zen 2 CPU cores, as well as AMD's integrated Radeon 610M graphics, all with a maximum TDP of 15W.

Focusing specifically on the AMD 7020 series APUs announced today, the top SKU is the Ryzen 5 7520U. Using AMD's new Ryzen Mobile CPU numbering system, the 7520U is a model year 2023 chip under the Ryzen 5 series banner using its Zen 2 core architecture. The U suffix technically means 15-28W, but in this case AMD has confirmed that all of the current chips have a max TDP of 15W.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U benefits from a 2.8 GHz base frequency across its four cores, with a 1T boost frequency of up to 4.3 GHz. It also includes a total of 6MB of cache, split between 4MB of L3 and 2MB of L2 (512KB per core).

AMD Ryzen 7020 Series (Mendocino) Lineup
SKU Cores/Threads CPU Frequency
(Base)
CPU Frequency
(1T Boost)
Cache iGPU TDP
Ryzen 5 7520U 4C / 8T 2.8 GHz 4.3 GHz 2MB L2 + 4MB L3 Radeon 610M 15 W
Ryzen 3 7320U 4C / 8T 2.4 GHz 4.1 GHz 2MB L2 + 4MB L3 Radeon 610M 15 W
Athlon Gold 7220U 2C / 4T 2.4 GHz 3.7 GHz 1MB L2 + 4MB L3 Radeon 610M 15 W
Athlon Silver 7120U  2C / 4T 2.4 GHz 3.5 GHz 1MB L2 + 2MB L3 Radeon 610M 15 W

Moving down the stack is the Ryzen 3 7320U, which has four cores and eight threads but a base core clock speed of 2.4 GHz and a single core boost frequency of up to 4.1 GHz. Like the Ryzen 5 7520U, it also benefits from a combined cache of 6 MB across its L2/L3 cache structure.

Looking at the Athlon-branded 7020 series chips, the Athlon Gold 7220U offers two cores and four threads, with a base frequency of 2.4 GHz, a single core boost frequency of up to 3.7 GHz, and 5 MB of shared L2/L3 cache. The Athlon Silver 7120U is pretty much the Athlon Gold 7220U, but it has a slightly lower 1T boost frequency of 3.5 GHz and half as much L3 cache (for a total of 3MB instead of 5MB)


AMD Radeon 610M with two graphics cores for performance at the entry-level

All of today's announced AMD's Zen 2 Ryzen and Athlon 7020 series will support up to 32 GB of LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel (64-bit) configuration, and feature two graphics cores/CUs based on its RNDA 2 technology, which AMD is branding the Radeon 610M integrated graphics chip. All four mobile APUs will also include a TDP of up to 15 W. 

At the time of writing, AMD hasn't revealed specific pricing aside from a total laptop price range of between $399 and $699. However, it has announced that its AMD Ryzen 7020 Series Ecosystem partners are Acer, HP, Lenovo, and Microsoft, with notebooks featuring these chips expected to start appearing on retail shelves sometime in Q4 2022. 

Source: AMD



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/oNUAqSz
via IFTTT

AMD RX 7000 GPUs could boost so fast it’ll make Nvidia’s head spin

https://ift.tt/yfFtbDk

AMD’s next-gen RDNA 3 graphics cards could reach massive boost speeds, at least if a new leak is to be believed.

The rumor dropped on Twitter – and it’s a real eye-opener from regular hardware leaker HXL, spotted by Notebookcheck.net – is that an unspecified RX 7000 GPU (presumably the top dog model) can almost hit 4GHz when boosting.

See more

As noted, we aren’t told which RDNA 3 graphics card that might be, and also, we don’t have any context for how that purported boost is achieved. Given that no caveats are mentioned, the presumption is that this is what a next-gen GPU might be capable of out of the box – but we obviously need to be very careful about accepting what we hear on the grapevine at face value, anyway.

To put this near-4GHz possibility into perspective, rumors around Nvidia’s next-gen Lovelace GPUs are theorizing that the RTX 4090 comes close to 3GHz or thereabouts – maybe around 2.8GHz, though other guestimates have been slightly lower. And don’t get us wrong, that’s still a big jump from the current-gen for Team Green. However, if AMD is looking at 4GHz, that’ll obviously be a big win for Team Red in terms of raw speed and the marketing of next-gen graphics cards.


Analysis: A bit of a stretch, really…

First off, we should make it clear that comparing clock speeds is not the only facet of evaluating GPU performance. There’s a lot more in play as to how fast those frames will fly, like other key specs – core counts, memory loadout and speeds – plus underlying architectural improvements with next-gen graphics cards which are critical, of course.

Still, there’s no denying that the possibly of AMD getting so much higher with boost for RDNA 3 compared to RTX 4000 would be a victory, and reaching these kinds of speeds would be a truly remarkable generational jump in itself. But there are lots of reasons to pause for thought here.

For starters, there’s so little info given in that tweet, it feels a bit throwaway and doesn’t inspire confidence. The timing – right before the RTX 4000 launch (check out our Nvidia RTX 4090 launch live blog for more info) – is also notably convenient, and smacks of either running interference, or just plain attention grabbing. As ever, we must treat any rumor – particularly vague ones – with an appropriate amount of skepticism.

Is it really feasible that AMD could reach these sort of clocks with the RX 7000 family? Well, we have seen boosts in the order of 2.7GHz with AMD’s current GPUs, or even faster than that, with overclocking thrown into the mix – and this 4GHz leak might relate to overclocking rather than out of the box performance.

We’d presume this is the case, but then, the way the tweet is phrased as we mentioned above makes it seem like default performance. At any rate, coming close to 4GHz seems quite a stretch, but maybe with overclocking we could see 3.5GHz broken, or even higher. It’s certainly within the realms of possibility with liquid cooling, perhaps, but without any further clarification from the leaker about exactly what this rumored speed entails, we’ll have to sit and wait for further leakage (which likely won’t take long to arrive). Notably, HXL does not add anything to that initial tweet, despite follow-up questions from other Twitter denizens.

Broadly, this does seem to at least suggest that AMD has the beating of Nvidia for clocks in terms of next-gen products, but we’ll say it again: just as with CPUs, it’s best not to get too obsessed with that headline figure, as the whole story is more than mere clocks. Indeed, the key card – so to speak – AMD has played thus far in the battle of the next-gen GPU hype build-up is that of efficiency and performance per watt, which could be a major boon in these days of spiraling power bills.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/tSLwfqI
via IFTTT

Friday, 16 September 2022

Wave goodbye to Celeron and Pentium – and say hello to the new Intel Processor

https://ift.tt/NhytSBD

Intel is simplifying the branding for its lower-end CPUs for laptops, with the Pentium and Celeron brands to be retired as of the start of next year.

So what will replace these veteran brands, which have been around since the nineties (1993 in the case of Pentium)? The new family of Intel’s baseline CPUs will be called Intel Processor.

That means wallet-friendly chips will be Intel Processor, and the mainstream offerings will remain Intel Core, with Intel vPro as the pro-targeted CPUs, as is the case now. The Intel Evo certification will also remain as a guide to quality in the laptop world.

The Pentium and Celeron brands are to be ditched starting Q1 of 2023, Intel says, so they’ll hang around for a bit after next year kicks off.

As Intel puts it, the move is about streamlining its brand offerings for the PC, and making it easier for customers to recognize the value proposition of these CPUs at a glance.


Analysis: Land of confusion

Our gut reaction is we’re not keen on the new brand name. We get that it’s meant to simplify things, as in what on earth does Pentium or Celeron mean anyway – especially to less tech-savvy folks – and what’s the difference between them? Fair enough to boil these brands down to one basic offering, then, but Intel Processor? We have a problem with that.

Namely (ahem) that it brings some confusion of its own.

“I’m going to buy a Window 11 laptop.”

“Cool. What processor has it got?”

“An Intel Processor.”

“Which one?”

“An Intel Processor, I just said.”

“Yeah, not AMD, got it – but which Intel processor?”

“An, umm, Intel Processor processor. That one. You know the cheap ones that used to be called Celeron.”

Also, using the term ‘processor’ as part of an official brand family almost feels like it’s a kind of attempt by Intel to absorb the term. Okay, so maybe we’re overreacting, but hey, these are our first thoughts on the matter. The name just doesn’t sit well with us, if only because while it simplifies on one hand, it introduces possible new sources of confusion on the other. And it feels weird. What’s next: the Nvidia Graphics Card family of budget GPUs?

Exactly what kind of silicon we will see under the Intel Processor brand, well, we don’t yet have a clue. But Intel says that it’s not changing anything about its current products or future silicon roadmap, and obviously these will still be the low-end offerings.

Note that as mentioned, this rebranding is for laptop chips only, but aside from them, there have only been two desktop Celerons (and no Pentiums) released in recent times; so they’re thin on the ground anyway away from the mobile space.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/hC3zqkZ
via IFTTT

Thursday, 15 September 2022

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU could hit an epic 5.85GHz – but you'll need a legendary cooler

https://ift.tt/fW3MvaF

AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X has been the subject of a fresh leak about the boost clock speeds which the next-gen flagship CPU is supposedly capable of reaching.

So, seasoning at the ready – and plenty of it – but the claim comes from Wccftech, whose sources reckon that while we know the 7950X is rated by AMD at a boost of (up to) 5.7GHz, the peak boost will exceed that, potentially hitting 5.85GHz as a peak (fMax) speed.

What this means is you may see speeds of 5.85GHz at stock – meaning straight out of the box, no tuning or overclocking applied – from the flagship chip, at least some of the time (with some big caveats, which we’ll dive into in a moment).

Apparently, the Ryzen 9 7950X will also have an all-core boost of 5.1GHz (some caveats apply here, which again, we’ll discuss momentarily) meaning that the CPU will be capable of attaining that speed across every one of its 16 cores, whereas the faster mentioned boosts will only apply to a single core in many scenarios. Obviously, pushing all the cores flat out is a far more demanding task than just one or two having the pedal to the metal.

Note that we have seen leaks of a 5.85GHz top speed for a pre-release 7950X in the past, so this backs up the current assertion (albeit this is all still the spinning of the rumor mill). However, AMD Ryzen processors are known to be able to top the rated boost, even at stock configurations, so it’s no surprise to see a modest bump here.


Analysis: Cooling is paramount with the Zen 4 flagship

Remember that generally, the rated boost of 5.7GHz is what you’ll get from the Zen 4 flagship CPU running at stock – AMD puts this on the box for a good reason, of course. However, that peak frequency of 5.85GHz is what you might see achieved on a single core on occasion, probably only briefly.

How often that occurs will depend on a couple of factors in the main, namely how good the processor you’ve purchased is – some run a touch faster than others, which is what’s known as the silicon lottery, with slight variances in tolerance for being pushed a bit harder – and also there’s the cooling solution to consider.

Skeptical hat on, but Wccftech tells us that in fact those 5.85GHz highs will only be hit when the temperature of the flagship CPU is kept under 50C (in other words, when well out of any thermal danger, by the sound of things). The contention, therefore, is that most users won’t see that peak frequency, at least not straight out of the box, and likely you’ll need a seriously hefty cooler (think liquid cooling) to witness it (and even then as mentioned, this will be brief peaks).

Similarly, with the all-core boost of 5.1GHz, some 7950X chips are likely to run a little more conservatively, and maybe hit around 5GHz, perhaps just a touch under. Although variances to this degree are not going to have a huge impact on overall performance, by and large.

Don’t forget that Intel’s Raptor Lake flagship is rumored to hit 5.8GHz, so the battle between the Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X will likely be closely fought – though naturally, performance depends on a lot more things than just raw clock speeds. What may be crucial for Intel’s side of the equation, in terms of tempting would-be buyers, is that Raptor Lake is shaping up to be a good bet for overclockers – the 13900K has been seen hitting 8GHz with exotic cooling already – whereas there are distinct questions marks over how much room enthusiasts will have to maneuver with Ryzen 7000 silicon.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/mdVYIAQ
via IFTTT

Monday, 12 September 2022

Intel confirms Raptor Lake CPUs will hit 6GHz out of the box

https://ift.tt/UagJc2B

Intel has been busy boasting about its next-gen Raptor Lake processors, and how they’ll be able to reach as high as 6GHz at stock settings no less.

Tom’s Hardware reports that this new info – and some other nuggets besides – emerged at Intel’s Technology Tour 2022 over in Israel, where a bunch of presentations have been made (mostly under embargo, as you might expect).

What was publicly aired is that 6GHz boost speed which the fastest Raptor Lake CPU will be capable of hitting, which is quite a remarkable claim – one which we’ll come back to analyze in a moment.

Intel also let us know that an 8GHz overclock has already been achieved, although that’s something we’ve heard about already – an equally remarkable feat, but not a very practical one (overclocking at that level requires liquid nitrogen cooling, and all manner of other caveats besides).

Team Blue had some performance figures on hand, too, with the news that going by the SPECintrate_2017 benchmark, Raptor Lake will be 15% faster than Alder Lake in single-threaded, and 41% in multi-threaded (the latter doubtless being evidence of the major boost in efficiency cores with this incoming generation). Take that, as ever, with the skepticism that should be applied to any pre-release marketing benchmarks, as these are always picked to make the silicon appear at its best.


Analysis: Which Raptor Lake CPU is this?

What Intel didn’t say is which chip this is – just that with one processor, Raptor Lake will be capable of hitting 6GHz by default, with no overclocking applied. Of course, that’ll be the top speed for a brief time courtesy of Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB), no doubt, so don’t go thinking that’ll be what you get as a constant level of performance.

Needless to say, it’s obvious that Intel is talking about the Raptor Lake flagship, which will be the fastest 13th-gen processor. However, the likelihood is that this is what Intel is delivering with the special edition of the flagship, the Core i9-13900KS.

What’ll happen is that when Raptor Lake is first launched (with CPUs expected to go on sale in October), we’ll see the 13900K at retail, and then as with Alder Lake, Intel will likely subsequently push out a faster (higher-binned) variant which would be the 13900KS (it was the 12900KS, at any rate, with Alder Lake). It’s probably that ‘KS’ processor which will be capable of 6GHz (in brief bursts).

Could this be the 13900K itself, the base flagship which is soon to land? Thus far leaks have pointed to a maximum 5.8GHz boost (with TVB) for that, and in all honesty, it’d be highly surprising to see this CPU reach 6GHz. Still, who knows…

Remember that AMD’s top Ryzen 7950X we know for sure has a boost of 5.7GHz, but what we’ve got to bear in mind there is that some chips will go faster than that (that rated clock is essentially the baseline level which Team Red can guarantee that all its 7950X chips will run at, and some so-called ‘golden’ samples will do better than that).

Besides, there’s a whole lot more to comparing CPUs than just clock speeds, so we certainly can’t jump to any conclusions even if Intel does turn out to have the upper hand with the top boost speed in the battle of the next-gen silicon. AMD will also have its 3D V-cache models coming down the line after the initial Ryzen 7000 launch, too, carrying plenty of promise themselves.

What’s clear enough is that Raptor Lake looks like it’s going to shape up as a seriously compelling pick for overclockers, with early attempts reaching 8GHz. And even without exotic cooling, if you get a good CPU – and win the silicon lottery – the results are likely to be very impressive indeed.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/j8CNwRY
via IFTTT

Thursday, 8 September 2022

A whole new breed of SSDs is about to break through

https://ift.tt/9NHf5IC

The Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) has released the first edition of a new set of standards designed to clear the way for a new breed of storage products: CSxes.

Short for computational storage devices, CSxes differ from regular SSDs or hard drives in that they handle data processing on-board, minimizing bottlenecks created by the need to pass data between storage and the CPU, GPU and RAM.

The new standards issued by SNIA were created to encourage interoperability between the various CSDs currently under development, as well as supporting the work of software architects and other programmers.

Computational storage: The next big thing?

Computational storage has been billed by market players as one of the next big things in computing for a number of years now.

Broadly, there are two types of CSDs: those that incorporate processors into the storage device itself and those that pass compute operations to a storage accelerator located nearby.

Although computational storage is not appropriate for every use case, it has the potential to dramatically accelerate applications that are limited by I/O performance rather than compute.

“There is clearly a broad class of applications that benefit from offloading compute functions from a main CPU to a more efficient processing engine that is more suited to the specific problem of interest,” explained Richard New, VP of Research at Western Digital, in conversation with TechRadar Pro.

“In the context of storage, we can think of applications like video transcoding, compression, database acceleration as falling into this category. A video transcoding device closely paired with a storage device can allow a video server to more efficiently stream content at many different quality levels while minimizing unnecessary I/O and data transfers throughout the system.”

In addition to providing vendors with guidance for developing new CSxes, the arrival of the SNIA standards establishes a set of common definitions that can be used to properly categorize the products that come to market.

"The 1.0 Model has a nice baseline on definitions – before this there were none, but now we have Computational Storage Devices (CSxes), Computational Storage Processors (CSPs), Computational Storage Drives (CSDs), and Computational Storage Arrays (CSAs), and more," said David McIntyre, who chairs the computational storage special interest group at SNIA.

Already, vendors from Samsung to sk Hynix are beginning to demo and release computational storage devices. But by bringing standardization to the market, the new SNIA specification could lay the necessary foundations for adoption on a mass scale.

Via The Register



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/XJu4lEk
via IFTTT

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X leaks suggest a CPU that could be a handful for Intel

https://ift.tt/9NHf5IC

AMD’s Ryzen 7 7700X processor has been glimpsed in a couple of leaked benchmarks which show an impressive performer in many respects.

The 7700X was flagged up in a CPU-Z test (now deleted) which was posted on Twitter by renowned leaker Tum_Apisak (courtesy of Tom’s Hardware).

See more

The next-gen AMD processor managed to attain 774 in single-thread, and a score of 8,381 in multi-thread. The latter shows the 7700X just edging out Intel’s flagship Core i9-12900K by 1%, and compared to the Core i7-12700K, the AMD chip was 8% faster. Put that multi-core result up against the Ryzen 7 5800X, and the incoming CPU is 28% quicker.

For single-thread, the picture doesn’t look so great for AMD, with the 7700K falling behind the 12700K in this case, and being about equal to the 12600K in fact (the Ryzen processor was 1% faster than the latter). The 7700K did beat the 5800X by 21% in single-thread, though.

Tum_Apisak also provided a screenshot in CPU-Z showing the retail version of the 7700X (apparently a model sent to a reviewer) boosting to 5425MHz across all cores, which very slightly outdoes the officially rated boost of 5.4GHz (by 25MHz – of course, depending on what quality chip you get, a 7700X could be capable of a putting its foot down a bit more than that during max boost).

That grab also shows the TDP of 105W for the processor, and that the 7700X was tested in a Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master motherboard with DDR5-6400 system RAM.

Another leak flagged by VideoCardz further shows the Ryzen 7 7700X in Geekbench, hitting 2,209 for single-core and 14,459 for multi-core, easily passing the Core i7-12700K by a 16% margin in the former, but ending up much closer in multi-core at just 2% in favor of the AMD processor.


Analysis: Zen 4 looking promising, but let’s not get carried away

This will be the Zen 4 CPU that a lot of people will have their eyes on, as it’s in the sweet spot of an 8-core model. While lots of folks still have 6-core (or indeed quad-core) processors, 8-core chips are making rapid progress, and they’re what you really need to be looking at in terms of future-proofing these days. The 7700X remains a relatively affordable CPU at $399 (about £345 / AU$590), certainly compared to the 5800X which debuted at the launch of Zen 3 and was $50 pricier in the US (there was no 5700X model at launch with the Ryzen 5000 range).

As ever, we need to be very cautious about any early benchmark leaks, but should Intel be worried here? Well, the 7700X does put in an impressive showing to marginally outdo the Core i9-12900K for multi-threaded performance, but we need to take CPU-Z benchmarks with more seasoning than normal in terms of reflecting real-world performance (and, of course, the gaming frame rates many folks will be really interested in).

Single-thread performance for AMD looks wonkier, but again, don’t put too much stock in these pre-release comparisons with CPU-Z (although the outgoing 5800X is handily outmaneuvered).

What we also have to remember is that Intel has its own next-gen range of processors, Raptor Lake, close to launch now, with not just IPC (instructions per clock) gains, but also a bunch more efficiency cores heaped on compared to Alder Lake (double in the case of the 13th-gen flagship, and the 13700K). So going by the above Geekbench result for the 7700X, it just outdoes the current 12700K by 2% in multi-core, but with the generational gains for the 13700K, and the doubling up of efficiency cores (8 instead of 4), well, when Team Blue’s next-gen rival rolls out, these comparisons could look quite different.

Ultimately we’ll only know when that happens, but for now, we’ll keep repeating what we’ve asserted in the recent past: that it still looks like both Ryzen 7000 and Raptor Lake are going to push forward nicely with performance, and decisions may well be made on the basis of other factors. By that we mean elements like cost comparisons, and upgrading to an all-new platform in the case of AMD (13th-gen Intel CPUs will still be good with Alder Lake motherboards, but won’t offer any further upgrade path going forward).

Oh, and patience could play an important role, as AMD is going to be on the scene with next-gen CPUs in just a few weeks, whereas Raptor Lake is seemingly looking at mid-October, or maybe slightly later, for its release timeframe. And with Team Red supposedly going to have a high-volume launch, leaving scalpers out in the cold – with Raptor Lake rumor pedlars worrying about pricing for a while now, with Intel looking to hike price tags on some of its chips for sure – there are certainly reasons to believe AMD will have some key advantages in the next-gen CPU battle.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/rh3cdSH
via IFTTT

Wednesday, 7 September 2022

Intel’s Raptor Lake flagship CPU makes jaws drop as epic 6.5GHz overclock is leaked

https://ift.tt/Cw4loT0

Intel’s Raptor Lake flagship processor has been spotted being run through its paces by an overclocker, with some impressive results – including reaching a speed of 6.5GHz (with beefy caveats, as you might guess; indeed, be skeptical with all this info).

This leak was highlighted by Wccftech (via VideoCardz) and comes courtesy of Brazilian overclocker Roberto Sampaio, who posted about his efforts on Overclock.net. Clearly we should take this post with some caution, but photos were provided too – although the whole lot, and all of Sampaio’s posts in the thread, have now been deleted.

Sampaio has further urged folks who quoted him in their own posts to remove that content as well, but some of the overclocker’s comments are still visible (at the time of writing).

Using a Core i9-13900K in an Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Extreme motherboard, the overclocker claims to have hit 6.5GHz on a single-core at a voltage of 1.45V using a decent liquid cooling solution. Although he adds that the chip in his possession is seemingly a sterling performer for overclocking.

That 6.5GHz was reached at “very light load” apparently, meaning that in practical terms, this obviously isn’t going to be the speed the 13900K achieves, or anything like that – and it was no doubt hit for just a very brief period of time.

That said, this bodes well for liquid nitrogen fueled record-breaking attempts, of course. Sampaio observed that at full load, the flagship CPU’s performance cores hit 5.7GHz (and 4.4GHz for the efficiency cores).


Analysis: Raptor Lake flagship shaping up to be insanely good?

Sampaio called the 13900K “insane” and wrote: “I’m testing the Z790 and 13900K and I can tell you… 12900KS is a kid comparing to the 13900K.”

The 12900KS is the current fastest Alder Lake processor, and remember, that’s the specially pepped-up version of the flagship 12900K. So, the Raptor Lake top dog is shaping up to be impressive, and this isn’t the only time we’ve heard this (though in fairness, Ryzen 7000 is looking similarly tempting, and boosting much higher than previous AMD processors, too; up to 5.7GHz in fact).

We do need to bear firmly in mind, though, that the overclocker apparently has a really good chip here. (Remember, CPUs vary within certain tolerances as to how fast they can run while remaining stable, and some are better than others – when you get a good one, you’re said to have won the silicon lottery).

One thing you may have heard regarding the 13900K is that while it can be pushed to achieve seriously huge boost speeds, this is at the cost of equally huge power consumption. Indeed, figures of 350W have been floated via the rumor mill in recent times.

Sampaio notes that these kind of rumored demands have been overstated, and with overclocking, an expectation of around 250W is more realistic. Moreover, he tested the 13900K with a basic air cooler (a $20 model) and the processor didn’t get any hotter than 90C.

Take all this with a good deal of seasoning, naturally, but these findings aren’t in isolation. Another recent leak made the assertion that Raptor Lake performs a good deal better than Alder Lake when cranking up voltages for overclocking, so it’s really starting to seem like these next-gen CPUs from Intel could be a great choice for enthusiasts and tinkerers who like to get the most from their hardware.

For those who fancy reading up more on all this, we’ve got a guide on how to get started with overclocking.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/tVbsj2p
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 6 September 2022

Qualcomm Unveils Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and 4 Gen 1 SoCs: Updating Mid-Range and Entry-Level Phones

https://ift.tt/A9gvq3w

Qualcomm this morning is taking the wraps off a pair of new SoCs for the mid-range and entry-level smartphone markets. Refreshing the company’s longstanding 600 and 400 series of chips, Qualcomm is announcing the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 4 Gen 1. Both SoCs are receiving similar spec bumps, incorporating newer and faster IP blocks from Qualcomm – such as Arm Cortex-A78 derived CPU cores – as well as moving to newer, more contemporary manufacturing processes.

The Snapdragon 600/400 lineups were last updated in mid and early 2021 respectively, so as Qualcomm is already preparing for 2023, the time has finally come to update the bottom half of their product stack. Following Qualcomm’s broad cascading IP strategy, this generation of parts sees both SoC lineups migrate to Cortax-A78 CPUs for their main CPU cores, and in the case of the 6 Gen 1, doubling the number of high-performance CPU cores. Both SoCs also come with faster Adreno GPUs, though in traditional Qualcomm fashion, the company isn’t offering much in the way of details on the underlying hardware there.

Notably, however, Qualcomm’s 2023 mid-range/low-end parts aren’t making the jump to the Armv9 architecture. Unlike the 8 Gen 1 and 7 Gen 1, which incorporated Arm’s new Armv9 cores, Qualcomm’s cascading development strategy means that the 6 and 4 series will remain a bit farther behind the curve. For end users this should have little significance for the moment, but for smartphone vendors and software developers, it does mean Qualcomm won’t complete the Armv9 transition for at least another generation.

Meanwhile, coming up on nearly a year since Qualcomm announced their initial Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC, today’s announcement from Qualcomm brings their remaining smartphone SoC families in alignment with their new product branding strategy. The 6 and 4 series pick up from where the 600 and 400 series left off, respectively, resetting the counted with the inaugural Gen 1 parts. Like the rest of simplified “Gen” series, this also means that Qualcomm is doing away with individual model numbers for its Kyro/Hexagon/Adreno/Spectra blocks, obfuscating a bit what generation of IP Qualcomm is using there.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/usxdT4R
via IFTTT
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...