Saturday, 31 July 2021

Intel’s high-end gaming GPU could launch at CES 2022

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Intel could launch its high-end discrete gaming GPU (known as DG2) at CES 2022, according to the latest rumor.

This info comes from a Chinese leaker via Weibo, so sprinkle some extra caution around with this speculation, which was highlighted by @9550pro on Twitter.

See more

Going by the translation of the Weibo post, the claim is that Intel will spring its Xe-HPG (high-performance gaming) card on the world at the next CES according to ‘reliable’ news from an inside source. Seemingly that will be the actual launch, as in cards being available in January 2022, and we might get some sort of reveal previous to that in late 2021.

Intel ON happens at the end of October, and Wccftech theorizes that we could get a glimpse or teaser of the high-end graphics card when that event rolls around.

We recently heard that Intel is now sampling the DG2 gaming GPU with partners, so development appears to be progressing nicely, and we were already mulling over the prospect of the card appearing at CES 2022 in previous coverage.

Speculation holds that DG2 could be faster than Nvidia’s RTX 3070, nestling between that card and the RTX 3080 in terms of overall performance.


Analysis: First impressions count

Intel’s Xe-HPG graphics card looks like it’s coming on well, then, but actually being able to buy the product in January 2022 seems a little optimistic. Also, a reveal at Intel ON in just a few months perhaps seems similarly so, although if it’s only a small teaser, that could of course happen. Remember that we’ve heard the possibility that Alder Lake processors could be unveiled at that event, with hints dropped by Intel itself, in fact, so we wouldn’t imagine that Team Blue will play all its reveal cards at Intel ON.

Intel shouldn’t be rushing to make things happen, anyway, of course. Indeed, the chip giant needs to make sure it absolutely gets DG2 right, because the first impression of this heavyweight gaming graphics card will be vital. And that impression is as much about getting the software right as the hardware, because running with initially flaky drivers will set the tone and prospects for the future – putting folks off if they have a bad experience (or hear about early adopters having a bad experience).

The GPU arena could really use a competitive third player, if only to (hopefully) attack on the pricing front, and curb what seem to be ever-spiralling-upwards asking prices. But if Intel doesn’t get it right out of the gate, being more affordable won’t matter – so we’d rather the chip giant took its time, getting things as good as they can realistically be, even if that means a longer wait than the very start of 2022. After all, AMD and Nvidia’s next-gen cards won’t be appearing until the end of next year, as per the rumor mill.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3j6VSwJ
via IFTTT

Thursday, 29 July 2021

Intel Launches Xeon W-3300: Ice Lake for Workstations, up to 38 Cores

https://ift.tt/3j2SuDa

With the launch earlier this year of Intel’s Ice Lake Xeon Scalable platform, the first Intel enterprise platform based on 10nm, we were always wondering to what extent this silicon would penetrate other markets. Today Intel is answering that question by launching the Xeon W-3300 family, using the same Ice Lake Xeon silicon but in a more focused single socket platform. Xeon W-3300 will offer processors from 12 core up to 38 cores, peaking at 270 W TDP, but offering support for up to 4 TB of memory.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/3i92mvR
via IFTTT

Intel Beast Canyon NUC Review: Desktop Tiger Lake Debuts in SFF Gaming Powerhouse

https://ift.tt/375h4hd

Intel kick-started a form-factor revolution in the early 2010s with the introduction of the ultra-compact NUCs. The systems were meant to be an alternative to the tower desktops used in many applications where the size, shape, and the system capabilities were mostly unwarranted. The success of the NUCs enabled Intel to start reimagining the build of systems used in a wider range of settings.

More recently, the introduction of the Skull Canyon NUC in 2016 was Intel's first effort to make a gaming-focused SFF PC. And desktop-focused Compute Elements (essentially, a motherboard in a PCIe card form-factor) launched in early 2020 meant that full-blown gaming desktops could credibly come under the NUC banner. Also last year, the Ghost Canyon NUC9 – the first NUC Extreme – made a splash in the market with support for a user-replaceable discrete GPU. Ghost Canyon was extremely impressive, but the restrictions on the dGPU size and high-end pricing were dampeners.

Thankfully, the introduction of Tiger Lake has enabled Intel to make multiple updates in its Compute Element lineup. Incorporating some tweaks and changes learned from their Ghost Canyon experience, Intel has now put forward its flagship NUC for 2021: Beast Canyon. With a desktop-class CPU and ability to accommodate most discrete GPUs in the market, the Beast Canyon NUC promises a lot. Does it manage to exorcise the ghosts of its predecessor? Read on to find the answer.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/2VghGxF
via IFTTT

Apple, AMD and Intel are taking gambles with the chip shortage – will they pay off?

https://ift.tt/3ybu00U

The global chip shortage, which has made getting hold of new processors, graphics cards, PS5 and Xbox Series X consoles, and most other devices difficult, looks like it won’t be calming down any time soon, and that’s led to some industry leaders ripping up their plans and trying something riskier.

In several recent earnings calls, the CEOs of Apple, Intel and AMD have all hinted at the challenges the chip shortage has given them and hinted at how the companies are trying to avoid any issues in the future.

First up was Apple’s Tim Cook, who in a Q3 2021 earnings call revealed that “We do have some shortages where demand is so great and beyond our own expectations that it is difficult to get our entire set of parts within the lead times where we try to get those,” and that Apple will “do everything we can to mitigate whatever circumstances we're dealt.”

As Ars Technica reports, those mitigations will likely involve rationing chips, so the more popular products, such as the upcoming iPhone 13, get priorities for the parts Apple can get hold of, at the expense of less popular, or older, devices like Macs and previous generation iPhones.

An artist's impression of the iPhone 13 in a variety of colors including red, pink and blue

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Gary Hargreaves, Head Technician of refurbished technology provider WeSellTek, agrees, telling us that “Apple will want to secure as many chips as it possibly can get hold of… [and] could lower production on a single model like the Mini to make more Pro Models.”

While it would certainly make sense to prioritise more popular devices to ensure there is more stock available, sacrificing more affordable devices could backfire. For someone who wanted an iPad mini, or an iPhone SE (2020), they may not be too pleased to find they’re instead being pressured into buying a more expensive model instead.

AMD is using a similar tactic. Like Apple, AMD uses TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) to make its chips, and as that foundry struggles to meet the demands of even its most important clients, it seems like AMD is changing course.

At another investor conference call, AMD CEO Lisa Su said that “We're focusing on the most strategic segments of the PC market,” and that has been interpreted as AMD also rationing chips to its more profitable products.

According to Reuters, Dean McCarron of Mercury Research, which tracks chip market share, suggests that AMD will focus on its more expensive high-end chips, “leaving the lower end of the market to Intel.”

If this is indeed the case, it represents a massive change in tactics for AMD, which has previously seen most of its success in the budget end of the market. Its recent run of success with its new Ryzen 5000 processors shows that it can challenge its historic rival Intel when it comes to high-end processors, but all-but abandoning the budget market, which it once dominated, is supremely risky.

Unlike Apple and AMD, Intel operates its own foundries, so if TSMC’s shortages mean AMD reduces its presence in the budget end of the market, Intel could see a prime opportunity and swoop in.


Analysis: Intel’s time to shine

Intel sign at CES

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

By running its own foundries, Intel might find it is in the strongest position out of the big three. Recently it has been feeling the pressure thanks to a reinvigorated AMD, while Apple has stopped using Intel processors in most of its computing products in favor of its own M1 chips.

The global chip shortage might take some of that pressure off. Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger told the BBC that the global chip shortage will get worse during the “second half of this year” and could last for a “year or two”.

After a few rocky years for Intel (Gelsinger himself admits that “"we did stumble, we did fall behind to some degree,”) the global chip shortage has refocused the company, and could allow it to play to its strengths.

It's building new foundries that should keep supply of its chips going when others struggle, and by getting more of its products out there – especially in markets its rivals appear to be abandoning – it could reap the rewards.

However, Intel’s plans aren’t without their dangers. Setting up new foundries is expensive and takes time, so if TSMC and other foundries get their acts together and the chip shortage ends, it may be too late to get the full advantage.

These long term plans also don’t address Intel’s current difficulties. It recently announced that its much anticipated 7nm process is once again delayed until 2022. Meanwhile TSMC claims it’ll be producing 2nm chips sometime in 2023, further widening the gap when it comes to performance. TSMC’s 2nm plans come as a response to Intel’s claims that it wants to make “the world’s most advanced semiconductors by 2024” and regain the global chipmaking dominance from TSMC and Samsung.

It looks like the global chip shortage hasn’t impacted the ambitions of chipmakers, then, but there are still plenty of dangers ahead, and that has led to many companies taking some big gambles. Time will tell if these pay off.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3l82E85
via IFTTT

Wednesday, 28 July 2021

AMD’s still on target to release Zen 4 CPUs and RDNA 3 GPUs in 2022

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

AMD’s CEO has confirmed that the company is on schedule to get both its next-gen Zen 4-based processors and RDNA 3 graphics cards out next year.

Lisa Su provided the update in a conference call following AMD’s latest financial results for Q2 2021, as Wccftech spotted.

Su said: “We remain on-track to launch next-generation products in 2022, including our Zen 4 processors built with industry-leading 5nm process technology and our RDNA 3 GPUs.”

The chief executive didn’t give any indication of when these new products might arrive next year, but the rumor mill seems fairly convinced that it will be late in 2022, during the final quarter (condiments handy). Both Ryzen and Radeon successors might even launch together, or very closely aligned; or at least that idea has been bandied about.

It’s expected that Zen 4-based chips (presumably Ryzen 6000) will give an impressive performance boost, but will stick with a 16-core flagship and not attempt to up core counts. And more excitement is now building around RDNA 3 GPUs with the possibility that the flagship could be seriously powerful (and run with multiple chips – but what effect that could have on pricing is another matter).

Unfortunately, there was also further word on supply difficulties with AMD products, and it wasn’t positive news. The company will apparently continue to be hit by stock issues over the course of 2021, but matters should improve at the beginning of 2022. Promises around ramping up stock levels of Big Navi graphics cards as 2021 rolls onward are looking a little shakier, then, perhaps.


Analysis: How soon in 2022 for Zen 4?

It’s no real surprise to hear that AMD is still on target to get both next-gen Ryzen CPUs and Radeon GPUs out next year. Indeed, if Team Red was to falter in terms of those aims, it’d be a serious blow to the firm’s ambitions – particularly on the CPU front.

While in her statement above, Lisa Su couldn’t resist reminding folks that AMD is ‘industry-leading’ on 5nm, with Intel stuck on 10nm with its next-gen chips, remember: there’s a lot more to the performance of a CPU than just the process it’s built on.

Alder Lake may be 10nm but it’s shaping up to be very promising given the whispers and leaks thus far, using a whole new ‘big’ and ‘little’ core approach which could prove to have serious dividends. Plus the chips are purportedly set to be tied in with Windows 11 and performance improvements due to Microsoft’s tuning under the hood of the OS.

While Ryzen has taken over the desktop CPU arena in recent history, there seems to be a clear danger from Alder Lake processors which could arrive in just a few months – with AMD’s next-gen not coming until possibly a year after that. That’s a potentially worrying situation, and while AMD looks like it will produce some kind of refresh in the meantime before Zen 4 – possibly Ryzen 5000 XT CPUs with 3D Chiplet tech – if Intel is making as big a stride forward as Alder Lake threatens, the concern is that a refresh may not be enough.

In short, the sooner Zen 4 can arrive for AMD, the better, and late 2022 seems a long way out from this perspective – with Raptor Lake, a refreshed version of Alder Lake, also set to be here by then.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3ycinGO
via IFTTT

Tuesday, 27 July 2021

AMD Reports Q2 2021 Earnings: Company-wide Growth Drives Doubled Revenue

https://ift.tt/3f30SRE

Continuing our Q2 earnings coverage this month, AMD is next out the gate in reporting their earnings. And, has been the story now for most of the last year, AMD is enjoying explosive revenue growth across the company. CPU, GPU, and semi-custom sales are all up, pushing the limits of what AMD can do amidst the current chip crunch, and pushing the company to new levels of profitability in the process.

For the second quarter of 2021, AMD reported $3.85B in revenue, making for yet another massive jump over a year-ago quarter for AMD, when the company made just $1.93B in a then-record quarter. Now, half-way through 2021, AMD’s financial trajectory is all about setting (and beating) records for the company, as evidenced by the 99% leap in year-over-year revenue – falling just millions short of outright doubling their revenue.

AMD’s big run-up in revenue is also reflected in the company’s other metrics; along with that revenue AMD’s net income has grown by 352% year-over-year, now reaching $710M. And if not for an unusual, one-off tax benefit for AMD’s Q4’2020, this would have been AMD’s most profitable quarter ever – and indeed is on a non-GAAP basis. Meanwhile, as you might expect from such high net income figures, AMD’s gross margin has risen even further and now sits at 48%, up 4 percentage points from the year-ago quarter and 2 points from last quarter.

AMD Q2 2021 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q2'2021 Q2'2020 Q1'2021 Y/Y Q/Q
Revenue $3.85B $1.93B $3.45B +99% +12%
Gross Margin 48% 44% 46% +4pp +2pp
Operating Income $831M $173M $662M +380% +26%
Net Income $710M $157M $555M +352% +28%
Earnings Per Share $0.58 $0.13 $0.45 +346% +29%

Breaking down AMD’s results by segment, we start with Computing and Graphics, which encompasses their desktop and notebook CPU sales, as well as their GPU sales. That division booked $2.25B in revenue for the quarter, $883M (65%) more than Q2 2020. Accordingly, the segment’s operating income is (once more) up significantly as well, going from $200M a year ago to $526M this year.

As always, AMD doesn’t provide a detailed breakout of information from this segment, but they have provided some selective information on revenue and average selling prices (ASPs). Overall, client CPU sales have remained strong; client CPU ASPs are up on both a quarterly and yearly basis, indicating that AMD has been selling a larger share of high-end (high-margin) parts. According to AMD this is the case for both desktop and laptop sales, and making this the fifth straight quarter of revenue share gains.

Meanwhile the company is reporting similarly good news from their GPU business. As with CPUs, ASPs for AMD’s GPU business as up on both a yearly and quarterly basis. According to the company this is being driven by demand for high-end Radeon 6000 video cards, as well as AMD Instinct (data center) sales. AMD began initial shipments of their first CDNA 2 architecture-based Instinct accelerators in Q2, opening the spigot there for data center GPU revenue going into Q3.

AMD Q2 2021 Reporting Segments
  Q2'2021 Q2'2020 Q1'2021
Computing and Graphics
Revenue $2250M $1367M $2100M
Operating Income $526M $200M $485M
Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom
Revenue $1600M $565M $1345M
Operating Income $398M $33M $277M

Moving on, AMD’s Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom segment has once again experienced a quarter of rapid growth, thanks to the success of AMD’s EPYC processors and demand for the 9th generation consoles. This segment of the company booked $1.6B in revenue, $1035M (183%) more than what they pulled in for Q2’20, and 19% ahead of an already impressive Q1’21. The big jump in revenue also means that the segment is even further into the black on an operating income basis, continuing to close the gap with the Computing and Graphics segment even with the all-around growth.

Overall, both the enterprise and semi-custom sides of this segment are up on a yearly basis. AMD set another record for server processor revenue this quarter on the strength of EPYC processor sales. Meanwhile semi-custom revenue was up on both a yearly and a quarterly basis, reflecting the continued demand for the latest generation of consoles.

Looking forward, AMD’s expectations for the quarter and for the rest of the year have been bumped up once again. For Q3 the company expects to book $4.1B (+/- $100M) in revenue, which if it comes to pass will be 46% growth over Q3’20. Meanwhile AMD’s full year 2021 projection now stands at a 60% year-over-year increase in revenue versus their $9.8B FY2020, which is 10 percentage points higher than their forecast from the end of Q1.

Finally, while AMD doesn’t have any major updates on the ongoing Xilinx acquisition, the company has reiterated that it remains on-track. Which means that if all goes according to plan, it will close by the end of the year.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/3iXONyo
via IFTTT

Intel hints at October 27 launch for Alder Lake CPUs, so AMD might want to get its skates on

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Intel’s chief executive has dropped a subtle hint that Alder Lake processors might be launched at the chip giant’s Intel ON event at the end of October.

As flagged up by VideoCardz, on yesterday’s Intel Accelerate webcast, CEO Pat Gelsinger described the Intel ON event – due to happen in San Francisco on October 27-28, but also virtually – using the term ‘fully hybrid’, which seems to be a reference to Intel’s Hybrid Technology.

Hybrid Technology is Intel’s take on ARM’s big.LITTLE architecture first seen in Lakefield chips and set to be used in Alder Lake, where normal ‘big’ (performance) cores will be paired up with ‘small’ (power-efficient) cores.

Intel ON will be about all manner of things, but that includes ‘PC solutions’ and the mention of ‘hybrid’ seems to suggest Alder Lake could be unveiled, particularly given that the rumor mill has already floated the idea that Intel is looking at a launch date around the end of October.

So, this fits with existing speculation, and it also makes sense in terms of Intel’s overall schedule. With Alder Lake silicon to be out late in 2021, an initial reveal coming at the end of October would seem to be about the right timing before the chips actually hit shelves (possibly the following month).

Then again, Gelsinger could be talking about something else of a ‘hybrid’ nature in Intel’s plans, so clearly enough we shouldn’t get carried away here just because this suggestion seems to fit with other nuggets from the rumor mill. Ultimately, only time will tell, but if Intel’s CEO is indeed hinting at just this, we only have three months to wait before we find out the true nature of Alder Lake CPUs.

Another interesting point here is that the grapevine has already asserted that the flagship Alder Lake processor will have 8 big cores and 8 small ones (for a total of 16-cores), and a render displayed during the Intel Accelerate webcast showed a 12th-gen chip with 8 large cores and 8 littles ones on the end, again providing a suggestion that the rumor mill is correct.

Sample chips of the purported Core i9-12900K with 8+8 cores are reportedly being sold in China, and we’ve seen a lot of leakage around these pre-release samples in recent times.


Analysis: Alder Lake demands a timely – and strong – AMD response

Intel has been long known to be scheduling a late in 2021 launch for Alder Lake, and as mentioned, October 27 fits with what we’ve heard from the rumor mill, too. It appears Team Blue is staying on target with its next-gen chips, then, and what’s interesting in the overall CPU sphere is that there appears to be no whisper of any response incoming from AMD.

While Ryzen processors have produced storming sales in recent times on the desktop, AMD can’t afford to rest on its laurels. The danger is that Intel is taking a whole new approach with the aforementioned Hybrid Technology and its incoming 12th-gen range, with speculation contending that Alder Lake processors are going to be quite something.

We’ve seen leaks which suggest that the Alder Lake flagship could be a Ryzen 5950X killer – salt handy, of course – and rumors that the low-power cores should provide plenty of pep in terms of overall performance, and aren’t just there for laptop users (and better battery longevity). Then there’s the further consideration that Windows 11 is apparently being honed to run better with Alder Lake’s new hybrid design.

All of this makes for a potentially formidable Intel launch that could take the wind out of Ryzen sales, with no clear answer on the horizon from AMD yet. Next-gen Ryzen processors based on Zen 4 aren’t expected until later in 2022, and with no Zen 3+ refresh in the offing according to the rumor mill, the expected response from Team Red is a 5000 XT revamp.

The worry is that may not be enough, looking at what Alder Lake promises, even if AMD is planning to put its 3D Chiplet technology to use in a 5000 XT range. And what’s more, if they’re really happening, XT variants will need to get here in a hurry, otherwise Intel could really push its advantage even harder with the 12th-gen launch.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3i7n3s8
via IFTTT

AMD’s RDNA 3 flagship GPU could be ridiculously powerful – but at what cost?

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

AMD’s next-gen RDNA 3 flagship graphics card could triple the core count compared to the current RX 6900 XT, or that’s the word from the GPU grapevine.

The Navi 31 GPU, which will presumably be the RX 7900 XT, is said to have 15,360 cores according to a number of hardware leakers, as outlined in a piece by 3DCenter (as spotted by VideoCardz, via PC Gamer).

There are a number of rumor peddlers weighing in here, saying much the same thing, and indeed renowned leaker Kopite7kimi floated the 15,360 core count nearly a week ago now. That compares to the RX 6900 XT’s 5,120 cores (or stream processors).

According to the speculation here – with much caution to be exercised, as ever – AMD plans to make big changes to the design with RDNA 3 GPUs, and that includes adopting an MCM or multi-chip module strategy, meaning instead of just a single big (monolithic) graphics chip, the card will have several chiplets (like Ryzen processors).

Using separate chips gives AMD the ability to load up far more cores than with a single chip – using a monolithic chip, it becomes difficult to pack the cores on, not to mention prohibitively expensive – but the challenge then becomes connecting the multiple chiplets so as not to degrade performance.

Caching in

That’s where AMD’s Infinity Cache comes in with the next-gen cards supposedly keeping a 256-bit memory bus, but using a different implementation and cranking the cache to 512MB (or possibly 256MB), compared to the current 128MB with Navi 21.

In short, the theory is that Navi 31 will use multiple chiplets connected seamlessly to work as effectively as a single chip. The rumor mill believes that the RDNA 3 flagship will have two chiplets of 30 ‘workgroups,’ each of which has 256 cores for a total of 7,680 cores per chiplet. (AMD has apparently done away with compute units or CUs with next-gen GPUs, and rather than having workgroups containing CUs, there will now just be workgroups with 256 cores as mentioned).

RDNA 3-powered graphics cards should be out in Q3 or Q4 of 2022, the grapevine reckons.


Analysis: A costly advance?

Of course, notwithstanding the fact that all this is rumored, even if it’s on the money – or at least close to it – we just don’t know how the purported chiplet design will pan out in so many ways. Even if the core count is being tripled, comparing RDNA 3 cores to RDNA 2 cores isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison – and furthermore, raw power is one thing, and how performance will actually translate to running games is another.

Still, what we’re hearing certainly sounds like a major leap for the next-gen Radeon graphics cards, and it’s easy to see how it’s getting a lot of folks excited about AMD really taking the fight to Nvidia next year. And this speculation lines up with what’s already been rumored about the entry-level Navi 33 GPU, namely that it’ll be a huge step up and could boast a spec to rival the RX 6900 XT.

If all this comes to fruition, though, a serious concern is what it might do to pricing, with a huge increase in performance generally commanding a spike in price tags. While the MCM route is more viable in cost terms than a monolithic GPU for beefing up core counts massively, this purported incoming flagship could still use two separate chips, and production costs won’t be cheap (after all, it’s effectively a board with two GPUs on it, not just one).

And let’s face it, asking prices for graphics cards are already through the roof – even recommended pricing before shortages and scalping are taken into account. While AMD may have some big RDNA 3 guns to take aim at Nvidia with, and drive the performance battle hard, are both these GPU makers just going to keep pushing upwards with the pressure on the wallets of gamers? That’s a less pleasant thought, but at the same time, with Intel getting ready to join the graphics card race as a third horse, it perhaps gives Team Blue a way in – more competitive pricing, which will hopefully force the dominant powers to react.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3BLttF3
via IFTTT

Monday, 26 July 2021

Best processors 2021: the best CPUs for your PC from Intel and AMD

https://ift.tt/3ljjL4e

Keep your PC perky and running smoothly with one of the best processors. As your computer’s brain, a CPU is responsible for executing all its commands, tasks and processes, which means that you cannot just go for a mediocre one and hope for the best. Especially if you expect it to do some heavy lifting.

So, no matter if you’re building a new PC that could rival the best computers on the market or upgrading your current one, invest in one of the best processors your budget allows. Thanks to Intel and AMD still battling it out in the CPU arena, chips like the Comet Lake-S and the Ryzen 5000 are more powerful and more affordable than ever before. There’s also quite a lot of them to choose from, so you won’t have to settle for less or the second best.

Whether you’re looking for the best processor for playing the best PC games, a budget yet reliable one for your home office needs, or one with sheer power to see you through the most demanding 4K video editing workloads, let us help you find your perfect match. Below are our top picks, alongside our price comparison tool so you can take it home for less. And, when you've picked out your new processor, make sure that your components are protected with one of the best PC cases and the best motherboard.

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

(Image credit: AMD)

Best CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Best CPU for high-end gaming

Cores: 12 | Threads: 24 | Base clock: 3.7GHz | Boost clock: 4.8GHz | L3 cache: 64MB | TDP: 105W

Amazing performance
A new single-core champion
Same power consumption
Price went up
No included cooler

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X brings the biggest gen-on-gen jump in a single performance in years, making it a terrific upgrade. This latest release from AMD is not just a stronger processor across the board. It’s also an incredibly powerful processor for gaming and creative work full stop. The fact that you won’t need a new motherboard is just a nice perk.

Read the full review: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

(Image credit: AMD)

Best high-end CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

A mainstream CPU moonlights as an HEDT processor

Cores: 16 | Threads: 32 | Base clock: 3.5GHz | Boost clock: 4.7GHz | L3 cache: 64MB | TDP: 105W

Performance powerhouse
Cheaper than HEDT
PCIe 4.0
Needs extra cooling
Limited gaming advantage

The highest tier in the Ryzen 3000 series is the performance powerhouse you’re looking for, if you want something for heavily threaded computer work. Besides high-end gaming, the Ryzen 9 3950 also blasts through processing tasks. It’s expensive, but for a mainstream processor that can go toe-to-toe with HEDT processors, that’s hardly a surprise. And, it’s also well worth the price, if you need its level of performance. Just remember that it may take a bit to keep cool so be sure to follow AMD’s guidance.

Read the full review: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

(Image credit: AMD)

Best mid-range CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Top performance on a budget

Cores: 6 | Threads: 12 | Base clock: 3.8GHz | Boost clock: 4.4GHz | L3 cache: 32MB | TDP: 95W

Excellent performance
Affordable
Includes a cooler
Still 6-cores

With more threads than the Intel Core i5-9600K, this mid-range graphics card delivers impressive multi-threading performance. However, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn’t just stop there: it takes that budget-minded stage of performance to a new level, with its increased IPC (instructions per clock) performance and a higher clock speed while staying at the same price point. It also stays competitive in even the most intense single-threaded applications.

Read the full review: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

AMD Ryzen 3 3100

(Image credit: AMD)

Best entry-level CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 3100

PC gaming just got cheaper

Cores: 4 | Threads: 8 | Base clock: 3.5GHz | Boost clock: 3.6GHz | L3 cache: 16MB | TDP: 65W

Excellent performance
Affordable
Doesn't suck up much power
Not as fast as the 3300X
May bottleneck high-end GPUs

Budget-minded consumers who missed out on all the 3rd-generation Ryzen excitement the first time will appreciate AMD’s latest attempt in the entry-level sphere. There’s no denying that the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is appealingly cheap, but it does so without compromising on performance. In fact, this chip delivers a performance that could almost rival that of processors double its price, without sucking up much power. And, it’s an excellent choice for budget gamers who are looking for something that can handle 1080p gaming.

Read the full review: AMD Ryzen 3 3100

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

(Image credit: AMD)

Best gaming CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Ryzen to the top

Cores: 8 | Threads: 16 | Base clock: 3.8GHz | Boost clock: 4.7GHz | L3 cache: 32MB | TDP: 105W

Excellent single-core performance
Strong for gaming
Low power
Price jump from Ryzen 3000
No included cooler

Intel no longer has the monopoly on gaming CPUs. Rocking 8 cores and 16 threads, along with much stronger single-core performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is among the best CPUs for gaming – as well as less demanding creative work – right now. And it comes with a much more approachable price tag compared to most of Intel’s offerings, making it a much better value.

Read the full review: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i5-10600K

(Image credit: Intel)

Best VR CPU: Intel Core i5-10600K

Hyper-Threading for everyone

Cores: 6 | Threads: 12 | Base clock: 3.5GHz | Boost clock: 4.7GHz | L3 cache: 64MB | TDP: 105W

Excellent multi-core performance
Affordable
Good thermal performance
No PCIe 4.0
Higher power consumption

Mid-range buyers will appreciate the fact that they actually don’t have to shell out quite a bit of cash for Intel’s hyper-threading technology. With Intel’s Core i5-10600K, among Intel’s latest chips to hit the streets in 2021, it’s possible to have it for much less than $500. This chip may lack PCIe 4.0 support and has a higher power consumption, but it makes up for those in spades. Besides hyper-threading, this processor also delivers superb multi-core performance as well as improved single-core performance. What’s more is that it’s got great thermals to keep that pesky heat down.

Read the full review: Intel Core i5-10600K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

(Image credit: AMD)

Best performance processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Perfecting the Threadripper line

Cores: 24 | Threads: 48 | Base clock: 3.8GHz | Boost clock: 4.5GHz | L3 cache: 128MB | TDP: 280W

Excellent single and multithreaded performance
Competitive price
Not backwards compatible

Launched alongside the even more potent Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X may have the same core count as its predecessor. However, it comes with a brand-new architecture that delivers performance gains as well as PCIe 4.0, making it among the best processors in the Threadripper arena. The 3960X delivers dramatically improved single-threaded performance and has successfully reduced its predecessors’ idiosyncrasies that affect their own performance. It may come with a higher price tag and require the TRX40 motherboard – not to mention, a powerful cooler – but it’s certainly worth the fuss if you can maximize its skills to your advantage.

AMD Athlon 300GE

(Image credit: AMD)

Best budget CPU: AMD Athlon 300GE

A best value performer

Cores: 2 | Threads: 4 | Base clock: 3.4GHz | Boost clock: 4.0GHz | L3 cache: 4MB | TDP: 35W

Incredibly cheap
Low power usage
Not powerful enough for demanding tasks

Whether you’re looking for a processor for your media center or for your desktop PC, the AMD Athlon 300GE is among the best processors you can find on the market today in terms of value. It’s reliable and surprisingly fast for what it can do. It’s never going to deliver a breathtaking performance, but for a processor in the budget space, it’s definitely going to impress you.

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

(Image credit: AMD)

Best HTPC CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Best for 720p gaming

Cores: 4 | Threads: 8 | Base clock: 3.7GHz | Boost clock: 4.2GHz | L3 cache: 4MB | TDP: 65W

Affordable
Radeon Vega graphics
Bundled cooler
Lower performance in applications than alternatives

With a noticeable, if small, performance advantage over its predecessor, AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G is a capable option for your home theater PC and budget gaming computer. That means that it’s among best processors for folks who don’t quite take gaming as seriously as the big gamers, touting a solid 720 and a fairly decent 1080p gaming performance. 



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3nBzMnF
via IFTTT

Sunday, 25 July 2021

Intel warns of CPU stock shortages in near future

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Intel has warned that we are entering a period where the supply of its processors for consumers is going to become thin on the ground, so unfortunately, we can expect trouble ahead on the stock front.

In fact, Intel’s chief financial officer, George Davis, has said there will be ‘acute’ supply problems in Q3 (from now through to September), following CEO Pat Gelsinger’s recent observation that the global chip shortage is likely to continue for one or two years, so perhaps until 2023.

Davis said on an earnings call (as transcribed by Seeking Alpha): “Persistent industry-wide component and substrate shortages are expected to lower CCG (Client Computing Group) revenues sequentially. We expect supply shortages to continue for several quarters but appear to be particularly acute for clients in Q3. In data center, we expect enterprise, government and cloud to show further recovery in Q3.”

Heavyweight priorities

Intel is prioritizing the production of heavyweight processors for the likes of data center use because that’s where the big profits lie (and also due to contracts the chip giant is bound by). Of course, if you only have a certain amount of production capacity, it makes sense to produce the biggest earning CPUs with the beefiest premium. Indeed, we’ve seen this before when Intel has struggled with supply issues, with the firm sacrificing lower-end processors to produce high-end Core models and server chips.

The central issue here is a problem with substrate (the base layer of the chip) supply, and as Tom’s Hardware, which picked up on this, points out, the specific issue is with insufficient Ajinomoto ABF substrates. Lacking these, Intel is constrained in terms of the amount of CPUs it can actually make, and while the company has made moves to work on self-sufficiency – finishing production of ABF substrates in-house, and also investing in ABF substrate makers – these efforts won’t have an impact to mitigate shortages until later in the year.

Davis said: “We did a really good job of eating up a lot of our substrates, some of which we thought we would have available to us in Q3. He added: “In Q3, we could see we had a real supply challenge, it is acute. But Q4, we are doing everything we can to help our substrate suppliers increase supply, including finishing up some of their manufacturing in our own facilities, which is something we could do with as an IDM [integrated device manufacturer].”

Analysis

While stock shortages are hardly anything new these days, and we’ve previously been told that component supply issues aren’t going away anytime soon – despite some glimmers of hope regarding GPUs – this latest admission from Intel is certainly disappointing.

More to the point, the production issues for Q3 being referred to as ‘acute’ and rather serious sounding is an ominous note for those looking to pick up an Intel chip in the near future.

Furthermore, remember that Intel is preparing to launch its next-gen Alder Lake CPUs later in 2021. Given the increasing amount of leakage around Alder Lake, and the fact that sample chips are reportedly already being slyly sold over in China, it seems like the 12th-gen processors are on target for a rumored October launch.

That’s Q4, of course, where Intel expects matters to pick up a little from Q3, but if Alder Lake turns out to be as promising as the grapevine reckons, it’ll likely be in serious demand. And given what we’re hearing here, it’s not difficult to imagine another situation where CPU stock becomes a struggle to find with new models, and scalpers then getting involved with the usual results and spiralling prices.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3BBcDbP
via IFTTT

The best PC case in UAE 2021: top cases for your desktop computer

https://ift.tt/3eTEutX

The best PC case isn’t just for show. More than letting people know that you’ve got some fancy setup or to showcase the epic RGB lighting inside, an excellent PC case is first and foremost designed to shelter your components and keep them away from dust, debris, and anything else that could harm them. Equally important, it’s also responsible for providing great ventilation to keep those components from overheating and keep them in tiptop shape.

It’s vital therefore to invest wisely in one of the best PC cases, especially if you’ve just acquired the best graphics card and/or the best processor. Even a quality SSD or RAM needs a quality case that not only protects it from accidents and the elements, but also helps it stay in optimum condition. Of course, it would be great if that case is also future-proofed, which means it has an extra bit of space or additional empty bays to accommodate more components in the future.

We’ve collected what we consider the best PC cases available right now to help you finish your PC build. And, if you’re looking for a deal, use the price comparison tool to find the best price on your favorite case. If you don't want to build your own PC, check out our best computers guide instead. And, be sure to complete your setup with one of the best monitors of 2021.

Best PC cases at a glance:

  1. Lian Li Lancool II Mesh
  2. Fractal Design Meshify-C
  3. Nanoxia Deep Silence 4
  4. NZXT H200i
  5. Phanteks Evolv Shift X
  6. Fractal Design Define R5
  7. Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-04 Tempered Glass
  8. Antec Cube
  9. Phanteks Evolv X

Lian Li Lancool-II-Mesh-rgb

The Lian Li Lancool II Mesh offers a ton of storage and plenty of flexibility for growing your build (Image credit: Lian Li)

1. Lian Li Lancool II Mesh

A truly versatile PC case

Form factor: Mid-tower | Dimensions: 478mm x 229mm x 494mm (L x W x H) | Mobo compatibility: Micro-ATX, ATX | PSU support: Bottom mount | I/O: Power button, reset button, USB 3.0 USB-A, 1x Headphone port

Elegant side panels
Excellent cable management
Can be a bit bulky to move around

The Lian Li Lancool II Mesh is an excellent way to kick off our list - not only does it come equipped with three RGB fans, it also supports a whopping nine drives for storage. You can turn this case into a bonafide gaming rig or storage beast, with plenty of room for expansion and radiator placement. If you're looking for a case that can easily grow with your future PC upgrades, this is a great starting point. 

Fractal Design Meshify-C

The Fractal Design Meshify-C has a unique style. (Image Credit: Fractal Design)

2. Fractal Design Meshify-C

The best mid-tower PC case

Form factor: Mid-tower | Dimensions: 395 x 212 x 440mm (L x W x H; 15.6 x 8.3 x 17.3) | PSU support: ATX | I/O: 2 x USB 3.0, 1 x HD audio in/out, power button, reset button | Includes: 2 x Dynamic X2 GP-12

Freshly designed in multiple ways
Reasonable price
USB 3.0 cable is too short Front
PSU dust filter is hard to remove

It is extremely rare to see any PC case that even vaguely resembles the Fractal Design Meshify-C. Given that the front of the case is entirely made of a mesh material sectioned off into an array of polygonal shapes, the Meshify-C has a unique style – without compromising on function. With two fans pre-installed, cooling is (forgive us) a breeze, even if the Meshify-C is held back by a number of obstacles. 

Nanoxia Deep Silence 4

The Nanoxia Deep Silence 4 is quiet as a mouse. (Image Credit: Nanoxia)

3. Nanoxia Deep Silence 4

The best Micro ATX PC case

Form factor: Small form factor | Dimensions: 380 x 200 x 480mm (W x H x D; 15 x 7.9 x 18.9 inches) | PSU support: ATX | I/O: 2 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0, HD audio in/out, power button, reset button, two-channel fan control | Includes: 2 x 120mm fans, 2 x modular HDD cages for up to five hard drives

Low-noise
Onboard dual-zone fan controls
 Not many extras 

As its name suggests, the Nanoxia Deep Silence 4 has the sole purpose of being quiet as a mouse. This silence-focused case is a well-balanced Micro ATX chassis that’s affordably priced, without sacrificing room for expansion. That’s right you can fit even the biggest, most powerful graphics cards in the Nanoxia Deep Silence 4. The fact that you will never hear it go above 30 decibels is just icing on the very taciturn cake. 

NZXT H510

The NZXT H510 integrates a ton of the features and sports some excellent cable management options (Image credit: NZXT)

4. NZXT H510

The best Mini-ITX case

Form factor: Small form factor | Dimensions: 210 x 349 x 372mm (L x W x H) | Mobo compatibility: Mini-ITX | PSU support: ATX | I/O: Power button, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen 1, 1 x USB 3.0 Type-A, 1 x audio/mic

Great cable management
Flexible build options
Limited front USB ports

Every single day mini-ITX gets more popular, and closer to toppling Micro ATX. And, it makes sense – why not spring for a small computer that can get just as much work done as a full tower? NZXT’s H-series case line manages to integrate a ton of features along with great cable management, making it the perfect choice for anyone who wants a neat PC build that they can show off with pride.

Phanteks Evolv Shift X

Phanteks Evolv Shift X is flexible to the point that it looks natural placed under a TV as it does on a desk. (Image Credit: Phanteks)

5. Phanteks Evolv Shift X

The best home theater PC case

Form factor: Small form factor | Dimensions: 170 x 650 x 274mm (W x H x D; 6.7 x 26.1 x 10.8 inches) | Mobo compatibility: Mini-ITX | PSU support: SFX, SFX-L, ATX (160mm max) | I/O: 2 x USB 3.0, power button, RGB button | Includes: 2 x 140mm fan, 1 x power supply cover, 1 x pump bracket, 2 x SSD bracket, 1 x PCIe x16 Riser cable, 1 x 8-pin CPU extension cable

Plenty of room for beefy components
One-of-a-kind aesthetic
 Massive for Mini-ITX

When you first look at the Phanteks Evolv Shift X, it looks more like a sound bar than one of the best PC cases, but this helps it vanish into any living area or studio setup. It’s flexible to the point that it looks natural placed under a TV as it does on a desk, next to one of the best gaming monitors. It may only be compatible with a Mini-ITX motherboard, but the Phanteks Evolv Shift X offers tons of space for components and liquid cooling loops. If this case is  a little large for your preference, you can get the smaller Phanteks Evolv Shift for easier management.

Fractal Design Define R5

The metallic and blue LED-lit face of the Fractal Design Define R5 is simple, yet elegant. (Image Credit: Fractal Design)

6. Fractal Design Define R5

The best silent PC case

Form factor: Mid-tower | Dimensions: 232 x 451 x 521mm (W x H x D; 232 x 451 x 521 inches) | PSU support: ATX | I/O: 2 x USB 3.0, 2 x USB 2.0, audio in/out, power button with LED, HDD activity LED, reset button | Includes: 2 x Fractal Design Dynamic GP14 140mm fans, velcro straps

User-friendly (and handsome) design
 Affordable price
 Definitely not tool-less

Fractal Design wins again with the Define R5, yet another mid-tower case with a gorgeous aesthetic. The metallic and blue LED-lit face of this case is simple, yet elegant, and is accompanied by noise dampening materials throughout its interior. In spite of the detachable ModuVent panels and drive trays not being toolessly accessible, it’s incredibly easy to build a system inside of the Fractal Design Define R5, plus it’s not as expense as you’d expect from a PC case with such a pretentious name, either.  

Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-04 Tempered Glass

Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-04 Tempered Glass has a deceptively large amount of space for future expansion. (Image Credit: Corsair)

7. Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-04 Tempered Glass

The best budget PC case

Form factor: Mid-tower | Dimensions: 492 x 201 x 433mm (L x W x H; 19.4 x 7.9 x 17 inches) | PSU support: ATX | I/O: 1 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0, 1 x headphone port, 1 x microphone port, power on button, reset button | Includes: 1 x 120mm LED front fan

 Attractive price 
 Very aesthetic 
 Only includes 1 case fan 

If you’re looking to save a few bucks, while still getting one of the best PC cases, look no further than the Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-04 Tempered Glass. Not only does it have plenty of space for airflow, it also has a deceptively large amount of space for future expansion, meaning that even at this low price point, you won’t have to worry about fitting a full-sized graphics card. And, when you’re done building, the tempered glass side panel will allow you to show off your handiwork. 

Antec Cube

The Antec Cube is without a doubt the best PC case for Razer fans. (Image Credit: Antec)

8. Antec Cube

The best PC cube case

Form factor: Small form factor | Dimensions: 365 x 250 x 460mm (H x W x D; 14.4 x 9.8 x 18.1 inches) | PSU support: ATX | I/O: 2 x USB 3.0, I/O button, audio in/out | Includes: 1 x 120mm rear exhaust fan mount

Ample space for power and cooling
Integrated fan controller
Wildly expensive
Less than satisfactory performance

The Antec Cube is without a doubt the best PC case for you Razer fans out there. While Razer hasn’t made its own desktop PC (not yet, anyway), you can build a Mini-ITX gaming PC, pretending it’s a razer product. You see, Antec partnered with Razer to bring its signature green-infused flare to the Cube, a small form-factor chassis. Complete with a deceptively high amount of space for future expansion, the Antec Cube is also compact enough to travel with. 

Phanteks Evolv X

The Phanteks Evolv X squeezes dual-system compatibility in a mid-tower. (Image Credit: Phantex)

9. Phanteks Evolv X

The best dual-system PC case

Form factor: Mid-tower | Dimensions: 240 x 520 x 510mm (W x H x D; 9.45 x 20.5 x 20.1 inches) | PSU support: E-ATX | I/O: 1 x Thunderbolt 3, 1 x Mic, 1 x Headphone, 1 x Reset button, RGB mode button, RGB color button | Includes: 3 x Premium 140mm fans

Attractive 
Plenty of space 
Expensive 

Who says dual-system builds have to be in a hulking full-tower case? The Phanteks Evolv X takes dual-system compatibility and squeezes it into a mid-tower. Even with that second Mini-ITX motherboard installed,  there’s plenty of room for E-ATX motherboards and power supplies, and ample cooling. It is pricey for a mid-tower case, but with all this functionality, it kind of has to be. It’s thanks to all of these high-end features that the Phanteks Evolv X is one of the best PC cases around today. Just make sure to fork out extra cash for it...



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3y66uSH
via IFTTT

Saturday, 24 July 2021

Nvidia RTX 4000 ‘Lovelace’ GPUs design finalized, could arrive end 2022

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Nvidia’s next-gen GeForce graphics cards, presumably RTX 4000 models, are codenamed ‘Lovelace’ (we’ve heard that name before, of course) and have now been finalized, according to the rumor mill.

This comes from leaker Greymon on Twitter, who also reckons that the GPUs will be built by TSMC on 5nm – and in a further tweet, the leaker explains that Lovelace products could be made using either TSMC’s straight 5nm process, or perhaps ‘N5P’ (theoretically an enhanced 5nm with better performance).

Greymon isn’t sure yet which of these routes Nvidia might travel, and of course, we have to take everything shared here with a good deal of caution, as with anything from the grapevine.

See more

There has been some confusion about whether Nvidia might tailor its next-gen graphics cards in reaction to AMD’s RDNA 3 efforts, as VideoCardz, which spotted the above tweet, points out.

Switching tack?

Renown leaker Kopite7kimi has suggested Nvidia could switch tack, from Lovelace to Hopper GPUs – or AD102 to GH202 respectively – depending on how AMD’s MCM architecture shapes up (remember, the rumor mill has suggested it’s going to be employed with RDNA 3 products). MCM or multi-chip module is a chiplet design, as opposed to monolithic (one single chip).

Nvidia could still go the MCM route itself, depending on how powerful it looks like the rival RDNA 3 GPUs might be, or that was the suggestion from Kopite7kimi. While spec rumors are definitely pushing it at this stage, Kopite7kimi has also floated the idea that the flagship RTX 4000 card will run with 144 streaming multiprocessors for a maximum of 18,432 CUDA cores.

Greymon, however, seems to pretty firmly believe that Lovelace is now locked in for Nvidia as the next-gen range of desktop graphics cards. As for the release date, Greymon tweeted that it will be ‘no earlier’ than the end of 2022, perhaps indicating there’s even a chance it could slip to early 2023.

Analysis

All of this must be treated with a lot more skepticism than normal because it’s very early days for Nvidia’s next-gen GPUs, and as we know, when rumors come far in advance, they are a lot more, shall we say, variable in quality and potential accuracy. Even what Nvidia is currently planning could well change, although Greymon’s main contention here is that the RTX 4000 series has now been finalized, of course.

Nvidia purportedly going with TSMC to produce these cards, either on 5nm, or maybe even enhanced 5nm, will be quite a leap, especially with the latter; so the performance boosts coming should be very impressive. Team Green may well be wise to look at pulling all the stops out, though, if AMD’s RDNA 3, due also at the end of 2022 in theory (and on TSMC 5nm), fulfils its promise as outlined on the GPU grapevine. Namely that the low-end next-gen AMD cards will be as good as the most powerful current RDNA 2 cards (like the flagship RX 6900 XT).

When you further consider that Intel is entering the graphics card arena, maybe later this year, or earlier on in 2022, with a potentially promising high-end GPU, then it’s easy to see how Nvidia might want to push hard to maintain its undoubted dominance in the desktop market.



from TechRadar: computing components news https://ift.tt/3kSXWuO
via IFTTT

Thursday, 22 July 2021

Intel Reports Q2 2021 Earnings: Client Computing Leads the Way

https://ift.tt/3wZEJd6

Kicking off another earnings season for the tech industry, we as always start things off with Intel, who is the first big chipmaker out of the gate. Over a year into the coronavirus pandemic – and slowly heading out of it – Intel has seen its ups and downs as product demands have shifted and the company’s ability to execute over the long term has been challenged by fab delays. Following a particularly painful (by Intel standards) first quarter, the company is hoping to put those problems behind them with a stronger second quarter.

For the second quarter of 2021, Intel reported $19.6B in revenue, a decline of less than $100M versus Q2’20, and what Intel is calling a flat difference overall. More importantly, perhaps, is that Intel’s profitability has also held quite steady (and significantly improved over Q1), with Intel booking $5.1B in net income for the quarter, a YoY decline of 1%. Overall, with a lone caveat, Intel’s Q2 performance has exceeded their earlier projections.

Intel’s famed gross margin has also recovered on both a quarterly and yearly basis. At 57.1% it’s up almost 2 percentage points higher than Q1, and almost 4 percentage points higher than Q2’20. Intel’s gross margin has been subject to greater than usual fluctuations as of late – typically dropping whenever a major new product is ramping – but at least for Q2 it is on the rise as Intel enjoys a very profitable quarter.

Intel Q2 2021 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q2'2021 Q1'2021 Q2'2020
Revenue $19.6B $19.7B $19.7B
Operating Income $5.5B $3.7B $5.7B
Net Income $5.1B $3.4B $5.1B
Gross Margin 57.1% 55.2% 53.3%
Client Computing Group Revenue $10.1B -5% +6%
Data Center Group Revenue $6.5B +16% -9%
Internet of Things Group Revenue $984M +8% +47%
Mobileye Revenue $327M -13% +124%
Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group $1.1B flat -34%
Programmable Solutions Group $486M flat -3%

Breaking things down on a group basis, there are a couple of major points to immediately take away. The first is that, while still recorded per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) rules, Intel is all but ready to cut loose its NAND memory business, which it’s in the process of selling to SK hynix. That said, the deal has not been approved and a closing date has not been set, so while Intel is opting to exclude it from their non-GAAP results (and future business projections), they aren’t free of it quite yet.

Second, this is the first full quarter that can be used for year-over-year comparisons with the coronavirus pandemic. While Intel’s manufacturing side has long since stabilized there, year-over-year numbers are sometimes in odd places as the demand mix a year ago was very unusual, to put it mildly.

For Q2, Intel’s Client Computing Group was once again the biggest winner; that division pulled in $10.1B in revenue, and is up 6% YoY. According to Intel, both laptop and desktop revenue is up, as Intel has surpassed shipping 50 million Tiger Lake processors. That said, these revenue gains are largely volume-driven; ASPs for both desktop and mobile are down, due in part to what Intel is noting to be increased sales of low core count processors. Intel’s improving fab situation has also played a part here – according to the company, 10nm production costs have dropped, helping to improve the division’s operating income.

Meanwhile Intel’s Data Center Group is really starting to feel the impact of the increasingly competitive server environment. While revenue was up 16% versus Intel’s tough Q1, it’s still down 6% on a yearly basis. Breaking that down further, both cloud server provider and communication sales are down, buoyed somewhat by an uptick in enterprise and government sales. But with chip volume and ASPs both down a bit, group revenue can only fall. Intel has long wanted to get away from CCG leading the company’s earnings – in big part by growing its server revenues – but for the moment it looks like that won’t be in the cards. Though as Intel continues to ramp up 10nm production (and thus Ice Lake Xeon production) there is some opportunity to recover in future quarters.

As previously mentioned, Intel is looking to cut loose its NAND business, which is now the only part of the company’s Non-volatile Solutions Group (Optane is DCG). None the less, for the moment Intel still has to account for the group’s revenue, which is down 34% on a yearly basis. Because Intel is downplaying the group so much, they aren’t offering any meaningful written commentary on why revenues are down, but it would seem to be pandemic-related. NSG recorded a very big bump in revenue a year ago, and things have since fallen back towards the industry baseline.

Rounding out Intel’s remaining divisions, both the ioT and Mobileye groups are up significantly on a yearly basis, with revenue jumping 124% in the case of Mobileye. Both groups are benefitting from the post-pandemic recovery, as well as additional design wins in the case of Mobileye. Otherwise, Intel’s final group, Programmable Solutions, saw revenues decline a few percent due to what Intel calls “inventory digestion and supply constraints.”

Overall, Q2’2021 marks a better quarter for Intel on both a quarterly basis and a yearly basis. Along with recovering from their tough Q1 three months ago, Intel this year isn’t facing another fab delay, as Intel’s big 7nm delay was first announced as part of their Q2’20 earnings. To be sure, the company is essentially flat on revenue and profit on a yearly basis – while its competition has generally grown – but as Intel gets further into CEO Pat Gelsinger’s tenure, there is increasing confidence that Intel will hit its goals (and a decreasing window to miss them).

Looking forward, based on their stronger-than-expected Q2 performance and optimism about Q3 and beyond, Intel is increasing its full-year guidance. The company is now projecting revenue to grow on a yearly basis, while gross margin projections remain unchanged at 56.5%. With that said, Intel’s projections all exclude their NAND business, with the company assuming that the deal will be approved by regulators this year as originally planned.

Finally, the next big business update from Intel will come on Monday, when Intel hosts its Intel Accelerated event. That webcast will be focused on Intel’s process and packaging roadmaps, and is a big step in Intel’s efforts to establish their IDM 2.0 strategy. We’re hoping to see more on Intel’s 10nm and 7nm roadmaps there, as well as more on Intel’s next-gen packaging technologies. In the meantime, Intel’s efforts seem to have at least caught the collective ear of Silicon Valley, as the company has revealed today that they’re in talks with 100 potential foundry customers.



from AnandTech https://ift.tt/3iyaYeq
via IFTTT
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...